NNDM vs. XRN
NNDM (Nano Dimension Ltd.) and XRN (Chiron Real Estate Inc.) are both stocks. NNDM operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while XRN operates in REIT - Healthcare Facilities (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, NNDM returned -31.82%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for XRN. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NNDM vs. XRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than XRN's 8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, NNDM has underperformed XRN with an annualized return of -31.82%, while XRN has yielded a comparatively higher 3.89% annualized return.
NNDM
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- 6M
- -15.73%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- -21.58%
- 5Y*
- -25.02%
- 10Y*
- -31.82%
- ALL TIME*
- -31.53%
XRN
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 13.32%
- 3Y*
- -2.19%
- 5Y*
- -7.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.96M | $3.90M | $6.00M | |
| $2.65M | $2.61M | $5.24M |
NNDM vs. XRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd. | -2.60% | -37.90% | 3.33% | 4.35% | -39.47% | -58.24% | 259.68% | -77.21% | -63.84% | -48.40% |
XRN Chiron Real Estate Inc. | 8.46% | -4.11% | -23.56% | 27.91% | -42.38% | 43.51% | 5.76% | 59.98% | 19.00% | 0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between NNDM and XRN is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2016 | 0.16 |
The correlation between NNDM and XRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NNDM:
$315.76M
XRN:
$469.84M
NNDM:
-$2.36
XRN:
-$0.76
NNDM:
1.60
XRN:
2.99
NNDM:
$102.44M
XRN:
$158.29M
NNDM:
$34.35M
XRN:
$4.76M
NNDM:
-$78.81M
XRN:
$65.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NNDM vs. XRN — Risk / Return Rank
NNDM
XRN
NNDM vs. XRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NNDM | XRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.72 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 1.75 | -1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NNDM vs. XRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than XRN's maximum drawdown of -58.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and XRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NNDM | XRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.27% | -58.92% | -40.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.52% | -20.21% | -22.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.32% | -39.20% | -22.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.25% | -58.92% | -22.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.25% | -58.92% | -40.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.31% | -43.46% | -54.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.51% | -23.69% | -57.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.78% | 8.32% | +10.46% |
Volatility
NNDM vs. XRN - Volatility Comparison
Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN) at 7.41%. This indicates that NNDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NNDM | XRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.86% | 7.41% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.30% | 22.52% | +21.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.90% | 30.56% | +27.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.31% | 28.95% | +24.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.97% | 34.24% | +101.73% |
Dividends
NNDM vs. XRN - Dividend Comparison
NNDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRN Chiron Real Estate Inc. | 7.24% | 9.78% | 10.88% | 7.57% | 8.86% | 4.62% | 6.13% | 6.05% | 9.00% | 9.76% | 4.48% |
Financials
NNDM vs. XRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nano Dimension Ltd. and Chiron Real Estate Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NNDM vs. XRN - Profitability Comparison
NNDM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported a gross profit of 13.25M and revenue of 35.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.5%.
XRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chiron Real Estate Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 38.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NNDM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.40M and revenue of 35.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.
XRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chiron Real Estate Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 38.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
NNDM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 35.32M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
XRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chiron Real Estate Inc. reported a net income of -749.00K and revenue of 38.06M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NNDM and XRN have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NNDM has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to XRN (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNDM dropped -99.27% vs XRN's -58.92%.
XRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NNDM and XRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer