PortfoliosLab logo
NNDM vs. QCOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NNDM and QCOM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NNDM vs. QCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NNDM:

-0.80

QCOM:

-0.65

Sortino Ratio

NNDM:

-1.20

QCOM:

-0.83

Omega Ratio

NNDM:

0.87

QCOM:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

NNDM:

-0.43

QCOM:

-0.69

Martin Ratio

NNDM:

-1.80

QCOM:

-1.13

Ulcer Index

NNDM:

23.60%

QCOM:

26.95%

Daily Std Dev

NNDM:

52.93%

QCOM:

43.40%

Max Drawdown

NNDM:

-99.27%

QCOM:

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

NNDM:

-98.26%

QCOM:

-35.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NNDM:

$336.79M

QCOM:

$162.88B

EPS

NNDM:

-$0.44

QCOM:

$9.60

PEG Ratio

NNDM:

0.00

QCOM:

2.18

PS Ratio

NNDM:

5.83

QCOM:

3.85

PB Ratio

NNDM:

0.39

QCOM:

5.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

NNDM:

$58.93M

QCOM:

$42.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NNDM:

$23.62M

QCOM:

$23.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

NNDM:

-$82.47M

QCOM:

$13.28B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a -37.50% return, which is significantly lower than QCOM's -4.97% return.


NNDM

YTD

-37.50%

1M

-3.73%

6M

-28.24%

1Y

-43.01%

3Y*

-19.58%

5Y*

-9.76%

10Y*

N/A

QCOM

YTD

-4.97%

1M

7.39%

6M

-7.43%

1Y

-27.71%

3Y*

2.78%

5Y*

14.88%

10Y*

10.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nano Dimension Ltd.

QUALCOMM Incorporated

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NNDM vs. QCOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NNDM is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NNDM is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NNDM is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NNDM is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NNDM is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NNDM is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

QCOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QCOM is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QCOM is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QCOM is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QCOM is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QCOM is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QCOM is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NNDM vs. QCOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NNDM Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is comparable to the QCOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNDM and QCOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NNDM vs. QCOM - Dividend Comparison

NNDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
1.76%2.18%2.18%2.67%1.47%1.69%2.81%4.27%3.50%3.17%3.72%2.17%

Drawdowns

NNDM vs. QCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than QCOM's maximum drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and QCOM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NNDM vs. QCOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) is 8.93%, while QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) has a volatility of 12.72%. This indicates that NNDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NNDM vs. QCOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nano Dimension Ltd. and QUALCOMM Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20212022202320242025
14.57M
10.98B
(NNDM) Total Revenue
(QCOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items