NNDM vs. QCOM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM).

Performance

NNDM vs. QCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NNDM vs. QCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.	10.39%	-37.90%	3.33%	4.35%	-39.47%	-58.24%	259.68%	-77.21%	-63.84%	-48.40%
QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated	-24.23%	13.84%	8.31%	35.07%	-38.58%	22.25%	77.08%	60.76%	-7.59%	2.05%

Fundamentals

EPS NNDM : -$1.77 QCOM : $4.90
PS Ratio NNDM : 2.41 QCOM : 3.14
Total Revenue (TTM) NNDM : $102.44M QCOM : $44.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) NNDM : $34.35M QCOM : $24.72B
EBITDA (TTM) NNDM : -$78.81M QCOM : $13.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than QCOM's -24.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NNDM has underperformed QCOM with an annualized return of -32.13%, while QCOM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.

NNDM

• 1D: 4.29%
• 1M: -9.57%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 8.28%
• 1Y: 6.92%
• 3Y*: -16.21%
• 5Y*: -27.23%
• 10Y*: -32.13%

QCOM

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -8.96%
• YTD: -24.23%
• 6M: -21.69%
• 1Y: -14.20%
• 3Y*: 2.63%
• 5Y*: 0.84%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NNDM vs. QCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNDM

NNDM Risk / Return Rank: 44
NNDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NNDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
NNDM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
NNDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
NNDM Martin Ratio Rank: 42

QCOM

QCOM Risk / Return Rank: 25
QCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
QCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
QCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 24
QCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
QCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNDM vs. QCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NNDM	QCOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	-0.37	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	-0.29	+0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.96	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	-0.43	+0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	-1.09	+1.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NNDM vs. QCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the QCOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNDM and QCOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NNDM	QCOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	-0.37	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.51	0.02	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.24	0.34	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	0.39	-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between NNDM and QCOM is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NNDM vs. QCOM - Dividend Comparison

NNDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated	2.76%	2.06%	2.18%	2.18%	2.67%	1.47%	1.69%	2.81%	4.27%	3.50%	3.17%	3.72%

Drawdowns

NNDM vs. QCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than QCOM's maximum drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and QCOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NNDM	QCOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.27%	-86.75%	-12.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.06%	-31.51%	+2.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.99%	-44.29%	-40.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.25%	-44.29%	-54.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.09%	-41.04%	-57.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.99%	-32.94%	-48.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.14%	12.59%	+0.55%

Volatility

NNDM vs. QCOM - Volatility Comparison

Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) has a higher volatility of 15.28% compared to QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) at 6.13%. This indicates that NNDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NNDM	QCOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.28%	6.13%	+9.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.15%	24.83%	+17.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.09%	38.61%	+13.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.11%	37.72%	+16.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	135.92%	37.36%	+98.56%

Financials

NNDM vs. QCOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nano Dimension Ltd. and QUALCOMM Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NNDM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported a gross profit of 13.25M and revenue of 35.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.5%.

QCOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a gross profit of 6.68B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

NNDM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.40M and revenue of 35.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

QCOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported an operating income of 3.37B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

NNDM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 35.32M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

QCOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.