NNDM vs. INO
NNDM (Nano Dimension Ltd.) and INO (Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) are both stocks. NNDM operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while INO operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, NNDM returned -31.82%/yr vs -40.51%/yr for INO. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NNDM vs. INO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly higher than INO's -61.09% return. Over the past 10 years, NNDM has outperformed INO with an annualized return of -31.82%, while INO has yielded a comparatively lower -40.51% annualized return.
NNDM
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- 6M
- -15.73%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- -21.58%
- 5Y*
- -25.02%
- 10Y*
- -31.82%
- ALL TIME*
- -31.53%
INO
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -44.51%
- 6M
- -58.47%
- YTD
- -61.09%
- 1Y
- -52.66%
- 3Y*
- -51.59%
- 5Y*
- -63.24%
- 10Y*
- -40.51%
- ALL TIME*
- -22.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.50M | $2.97M | $3.39M | |
| $4.96M | $3.90M | $6.00M |
NNDM vs. INO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd. | -2.60% | -37.90% | 3.33% | 4.35% | -39.47% | -58.24% | 259.68% | -77.21% | -63.84% | -48.40% |
INO Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -61.09% | -4.92% | -70.10% | -67.31% | -68.74% | -43.62% | 168.18% | -17.50% | -3.15% | -40.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NNDM and INO is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016 | 0.20 |
The correlation between NNDM and INO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NNDM:
$315.76M
INO:
$36.28M
NNDM:
-$2.36
INO:
-$48.88
NNDM:
$102.44M
INO:
$0.00
NNDM:
$34.35M
INO:
-$1.50M
NNDM:
-$78.81M
INO:
-$22.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NNDM vs. INO — Risk / Return Rank
NNDM
INO
NNDM vs. INO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NNDM | INO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.93 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | -0.68 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | -1.23 | +1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NNDM vs. INO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, roughly equal to the maximum INO drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and INO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NNDM | INO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.27% | -99.97% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.52% | -77.14% | +34.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.32% | -95.27% | +33.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.25% | -99.44% | +18.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.25% | -99.83% | +0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.31% | -99.97% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.51% | -92.38% | +10.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.78% | 42.55% | -23.77% |
Volatility
NNDM vs. INO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) is 8.86%, while Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO) has a volatility of 47.66%. This indicates that NNDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NNDM | INO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.86% | 47.66% | -38.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.30% | 73.50% | -29.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.90% | 86.75% | -28.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.31% | 87.21% | -33.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.97% | 93.96% | +42.01% |
Dividends
NNDM vs. INO - Dividend Comparison
Neither NNDM nor INO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NNDM vs. INO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nano Dimension Ltd. and Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NNDM and INO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INO has higher volatility (47.66%) compared to NNDM (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNDM dropped -99.27% vs INO's -99.97%.
NNDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NNDM and INO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer