PortfoliosLab logo
NNDM vs. PLTR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NNDM and PLTR is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NNDM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NNDM:

-0.80

PLTR:

7.09

Sortino Ratio

NNDM:

-1.20

PLTR:

5.33

Omega Ratio

NNDM:

0.87

PLTR:

1.72

Calmar Ratio

NNDM:

-0.43

PLTR:

11.36

Martin Ratio

NNDM:

-1.80

PLTR:

39.09

Ulcer Index

NNDM:

23.60%

PLTR:

13.46%

Daily Std Dev

NNDM:

52.93%

PLTR:

72.56%

Max Drawdown

NNDM:

-99.27%

PLTR:

-84.62%

Current Drawdown

NNDM:

-98.26%

PLTR:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NNDM:

$336.79M

PLTR:

$298.21B

EPS

NNDM:

-$0.44

PLTR:

$0.25

PEG Ratio

NNDM:

0.00

PLTR:

3.87

PS Ratio

NNDM:

5.83

PLTR:

95.73

PB Ratio

NNDM:

0.39

PLTR:

53.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

NNDM:

$58.93M

PLTR:

$3.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NNDM:

$23.62M

PLTR:

$2.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

NNDM:

-$82.47M

PLTR:

$428.72M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a -37.50% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's 74.24% return.


NNDM

YTD

-37.50%

1M

-3.73%

6M

-28.24%

1Y

-43.01%

3Y*

-19.58%

5Y*

-9.76%

10Y*

N/A

PLTR

YTD

74.24%

1M

13.41%

6M

96.45%

1Y

507.84%

3Y*

147.61%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nano Dimension Ltd.

Palantir Technologies Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NNDM vs. PLTR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NNDM is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NNDM is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NNDM is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NNDM is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NNDM is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NNDM is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLTR is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLTR is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLTR is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLTR is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLTR is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLTR is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NNDM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NNDM Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 7.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNDM and PLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NNDM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NNDM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NNDM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and PLTR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NNDM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) is 8.93%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that NNDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NNDM vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nano Dimension Ltd. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
14.57M
883.86M
(NNDM) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items