NNDM vs. PLTR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR).

Performance

NNDM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NNDM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.	10.39%	-37.90%	3.33%	4.35%	-39.47%	-58.24%	218.18%
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc.	-17.70%	135.03%	340.48%	167.45%	-64.74%	-22.68%	147.89%

Fundamentals

EPS NNDM : -$1.77 PLTR : $0.63
PS Ratio NNDM : 2.41 PLTR : 83.88
Total Revenue (TTM) NNDM : $102.44M PLTR : $4.48B
Gross Profit (TTM) NNDM : $34.35M PLTR : $3.69B
EBITDA (TTM) NNDM : -$78.81M PLTR : $1.52B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -17.70% return.

NNDM

• 1D: 4.29%
• 1M: -9.57%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 8.28%
• 1Y: 6.92%
• 3Y*: -16.21%
• 5Y*: -27.23%
• 10Y*: -32.13%

PLTR

• 1D: 6.35%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: -17.70%
• 6M: -19.81%
• 1Y: 73.32%
• 3Y*: 158.69%
• 5Y*: 44.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NNDM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNDM

NNDM Risk / Return Rank: 44
NNDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NNDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
NNDM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
NNDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
NNDM Martin Ratio Rank: 42

PLTR

PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 77
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNDM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NNDM	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	1.28	-1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	1.85	-1.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.24	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	1.86	-1.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	4.55	-4.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NNDM vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNDM and PLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NNDM	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	1.28	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.51	0.69	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	0.92	-1.16

Correlation

The correlation between NNDM and PLTR is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NNDM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NNDM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NNDM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and PLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NNDM	PLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.27%	-84.62%	-14.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.06%	-37.81%	+8.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.99%	-79.14%	-5.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.09%	-29.39%	-68.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.99%	-40.57%	-40.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.14%	15.48%	-2.34%

Volatility

NNDM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) have volatilities of 15.28% and 14.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NNDM	PLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.28%	14.75%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.15%	37.73%	+4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.09%	57.68%	-5.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.11%	65.50%	-11.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	135.92%	70.22%	+65.70%

Financials

NNDM vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nano Dimension Ltd. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NNDM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported a gross profit of 13.25M and revenue of 35.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.5%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.7%.

NNDM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.40M and revenue of 35.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 575.39M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.9%.

NNDM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 35.32M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 608.68M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 43.3%.