NNDM vs. PLTR
NNDM (Nano Dimension Ltd.) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — NNDM in Computer Hardware, PLTR in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 5 years, NNDM returned -26.50%/yr vs 42.70%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NNDM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -20.00% return.
NNDM
- 1D
- -6.25%
- 1M
- -13.16%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- -8.33%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- -12.23%
- 5Y*
- -26.50%
- 10Y*
- -31.71%
PLTR
- 1D
- -6.55%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -20.00%
- 6M
- -19.24%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 113.95%
- 5Y*
- 42.70%
- 10Y*
- —
NNDM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd. | 7.14% | -37.90% | 3.33% | 4.35% | -39.47% | -58.24% | 218.18% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -20.00% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 147.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between NNDM and PLTR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NNDM and PLTR has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NNDM:
-$1.77
PLTR:
$0.89
NNDM:
2.34
PLTR:
69.88
NNDM:
$102.44M
PLTR:
$5.22B
NNDM:
$34.35M
PLTR:
$4.39B
NNDM:
-$78.81M
PLTR:
$2.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NNDM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
NNDM
PLTR
NNDM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NNDM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.18 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | 0.33 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NNDM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 0.13 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | 0.66 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.88 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
NNDM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NNDM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.27% | -84.62% | -14.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.91% | -38.19% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.45% | -40.61% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.99% | -79.14% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.14% | -31.36% | -66.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.28% | -40.31% | -40.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.16% | 20.40% | -5.24% |
Volatility
NNDM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) has a higher volatility of 22.68% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 18.39%. This indicates that NNDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NNDM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.68% | 18.39% | +4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.59% | 38.32% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.11% | 51.70% | +4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.53% | 65.41% | -11.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.93% | 69.86% | +66.07% |
Dividends
NNDM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither NNDM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NNDM vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nano Dimension Ltd. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NNDM vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison
NNDM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported a gross profit of 13.25M and revenue of 35.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.5%.
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
NNDM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.40M and revenue of 35.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
NNDM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 35.32M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NNDM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NNDM has higher volatility (22.68%) compared to PLTR (18.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNDM dropped -99.27% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NNDM and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer