PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NNDM vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NNDM vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NNDM vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
10.39%-37.90%-8.49%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-13.58%-42.71%200.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -13.58% return.


NNDM

1D
4.29%
1M
-9.57%
YTD
10.39%
6M
8.28%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
-16.21%
5Y*
-27.23%
10Y*
-32.13%

MSTY

1D
2.45%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-13.58%
6M
-54.23%
1Y
-48.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NNDM vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNDM
NNDM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NNDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NNDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNDM vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NNDMMSTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.13

-0.77

+0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

-1.05

+1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.88

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

-0.68

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.09

-1.22

+1.31

NNDM vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNDM and MSTY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NNDMMSTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

-0.77

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.29

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between NNDM and MSTY is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NNDM vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

NNDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 298.73%.


TTM20252024
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
298.73%294.61%104.56%

Drawdowns

NNDM vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than MSTY's maximum drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and MSTY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NNDMMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-71.79%

-27.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.06%

-71.79%

+42.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.09%

-66.02%

-32.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.99%

-23.37%

-57.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.14%

40.02%

-26.88%

Volatility

NNDM vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) have volatilities of 15.28% and 14.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NNDMMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.28%

14.90%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.15%

48.86%

-6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.09%

63.88%

-11.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.11%

72.67%

-18.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

135.92%

72.67%

+63.25%