NNDM vs. MSTY
NNDM (Nano Dimension Ltd.) is a stock, while MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, NNDM returned 6.45% vs -61.25% for MSTY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NNDM vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NNDM achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -14.73% return.
NNDM
- 1D
- -6.25%
- 1M
- -13.16%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- -8.33%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- -12.23%
- 5Y*
- -26.50%
- 10Y*
- -31.71%
MSTY
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -28.46%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -61.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NNDM vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd. | 7.14% | -37.90% | -8.49% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -14.73% | -42.71% | 200.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NNDM and MSTY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NNDM vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
NNDM
MSTY
NNDM vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NNDM | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.81 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | -0.86 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | -1.31 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NNDM | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | -1.02 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.26 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
NNDM vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NNDM drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than MSTY's maximum drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNDM and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NNDM | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.27% | -71.79% | -27.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.91% | -71.79% | +41.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.14% | -66.48% | -31.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.28% | -26.09% | -55.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.16% | 46.87% | -31.71% |
Volatility
NNDM vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) has a higher volatility of 22.68% compared to YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) at 17.01%. This indicates that NNDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NNDM | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.68% | 17.01% | +5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.59% | 48.79% | -8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.11% | 60.44% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.53% | 71.92% | -18.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.93% | 71.92% | +64.01% |
Dividends
NNDM vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
NNDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 269.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 269.45% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NNDM and MSTY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NNDM has higher volatility (22.68%) compared to MSTY (17.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNDM dropped -99.27% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
NNDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NNDM and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer