XRN vs. BNGO
XRN (Chiron Real Estate Inc.) and BNGO (Bionano Genomics, Inc.) are both stocks. XRN operates in REIT - Healthcare Facilities (Real Estate), while BNGO operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, XRN returned -6.77%/yr vs -80.70%/yr for BNGO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XRN vs. BNGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRN achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly higher than BNGO's -24.84% return.
XRN
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 21.56%
- 3Y*
- 0.33%
- 5Y*
- -6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
BNGO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- -24.84%
- 6M
- -24.84%
- 1Y
- -64.83%
- 3Y*
- -85.42%
- 5Y*
- -80.70%
- 10Y*
- —
XRN vs. BNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRN Chiron Real Estate Inc. | 6.69% | -4.11% | -23.56% | 27.91% | -42.38% | 43.51% | 5.76% | 59.98% | -3.48% |
BNGO Bionano Genomics, Inc. | -24.84% | -91.16% | -84.74% | -87.05% | -51.17% | -2.92% | 148.39% | -76.34% | -47.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRN and BNGO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XRN and BNGO has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.21, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
XRN:
-$0.76
BNGO:
-$6.55
XRN:
2.96
BNGO:
0.19
XRN:
$158.29M
BNGO:
$22.06M
XRN:
$4.76M
BNGO:
$3.32M
XRN:
$65.81M
BNGO:
-$23.09M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRN vs. BNGO — Risk / Return Rank
XRN
BNGO
XRN vs. BNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN) and Bionano Genomics, Inc. (BNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRN | BNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.83 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | -0.83 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | -1.04 | +3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRN vs. BNGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRN drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, smaller than the maximum BNGO drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRN and BNGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRN | BNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.92% | -99.99% | +41.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -77.85% | +57.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.20% | -99.72% | +60.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.92% | -99.98% | +41.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.38% | -99.99% | +55.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -85.27% | +61.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.52% | 62.38% | -53.86% |
Volatility
XRN vs. BNGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN) is 7.64%, while Bionano Genomics, Inc. (BNGO) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that XRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRN | BNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 10.24% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.81% | 44.87% | -23.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.08% | 80.99% | -49.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.87% | 89.81% | -60.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.20% | 191.30% | -157.10% |
Dividends
XRN vs. BNGO - Dividend Comparison
XRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, while BNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNGO Bionano Genomics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRN Chiron Real Estate Inc. | 6.87% | 9.78% | 10.88% | 7.57% | 8.86% | 4.62% | 6.13% | 6.05% | 9.00% | 9.76% | 4.48% |
Financials
XRN vs. BNGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chiron Real Estate Inc. and Bionano Genomics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
XRN and BNGO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNGO has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to XRN (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRN dropped -58.92% vs BNGO's -99.99%.
XRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRN and BNGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer