XRN vs. CLF
XRN (Chiron Real Estate Inc.) and CLF (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.) are both stocks. XRN operates in REIT - Healthcare Facilities (Real Estate), while CLF operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, XRN returned 3.89%/yr vs 4.33%/yr for CLF. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
XRN vs. CLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRN achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than CLF's -13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XRN has underperformed CLF with an annualized return of 3.89%, while CLF has yielded a comparatively higher 4.33% annualized return.
XRN
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 13.32%
- 3Y*
- -2.19%
- 5Y*
- -7.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.66%
CLF
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 16.84%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- YTD
- -13.25%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- -13.29%
- 5Y*
- -14.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $404.71M | $285.99M | $240.22M | |
| $2.65M | $2.61M | $5.24M |
XRN vs. CLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRN Chiron Real Estate Inc. | 8.46% | -4.11% | -23.56% | 27.91% | -42.38% | 43.51% | 5.76% | 59.98% | 19.00% | 0.65% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | -13.25% | 41.28% | -53.97% | 26.75% | -26.00% | 49.52% | 77.38% | 12.72% | 6.66% | -14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRN and CLF is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2016 | 0.22 |
The correlation between XRN and CLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
XRN:
$469.84M
CLF:
$6.57B
XRN:
-$0.76
CLF:
-$2.26
XRN:
2.99
CLF:
0.23
XRN:
$158.29M
CLF:
$19.20B
XRN:
$4.76M
CLF:
-$319.00M
XRN:
$65.81M
CLF:
$294.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRN vs. CLF — Risk / Return Rank
XRN
CLF
XRN vs. CLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRN | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.09 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.18 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 0.34 | +1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRN vs. CLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRN drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, smaller than the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRN and CLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRN | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.92% | -98.78% | +39.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -51.67% | +31.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.20% | -74.46% | +35.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.92% | -82.37% | +23.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.92% | -82.37% | +23.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.46% | -88.25% | +44.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -47.77% | +24.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.32% | 27.94% | -19.62% |
Volatility
XRN vs. CLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN) is 7.41%, while Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that XRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRN | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 20.47% | -13.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.52% | 50.08% | -27.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 68.52% | -37.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.95% | 59.51% | -30.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.24% | 62.07% | -27.83% |
Dividends
XRN vs. CLF - Dividend Comparison
XRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, while CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRN Chiron Real Estate Inc. | 7.24% | 9.78% | 10.88% | 7.57% | 8.86% | 4.62% | 6.13% | 6.05% | 9.00% | 9.76% | 4.48% |
Financials
XRN vs. CLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chiron Real Estate Inc. and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XRN vs. CLF - Profitability Comparison
XRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chiron Real Estate Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 38.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
XRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chiron Real Estate Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 38.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported an operating income of 1.00M and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
XRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chiron Real Estate Inc. reported a net income of -749.00K and revenue of 38.06M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.
CLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a net income of -145.00M and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRN and CLF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLF has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to XRN (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRN dropped -58.92% vs CLF's -98.78%.
XRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRN and CLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer