PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRN vs. ASRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XRN vs. ASRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN) and Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRN achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than ASRT's 159.10% return.


XRN

1D
2.00%
1M
-3.97%
YTD
8.82%
6M
11.39%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
1.00%
5Y*
-6.40%
10Y*

ASRT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
159.10%
6M
137.37%
1Y
148.20%
3Y*
-36.01%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*
-32.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRN vs. ASRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRN
Chiron Real Estate Inc.
8.82%-4.11%-23.56%27.91%-42.38%43.51%5.76%59.98%19.00%0.65%
ASRT
Assertio Holdings, Inc.
159.10%-30.59%-18.59%-75.12%97.25%52.40%-71.39%-65.37%-55.16%-55.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XRN and ASRT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2016

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XRN:

$473.42M

ASRT:

$151.20M

EPS

XRN:

-$0.76

ASRT:

-$5.27

PS Ratio

XRN:

3.02

ASRT:

1.52

PB Ratio

XRN:

1.26

ASRT:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

XRN:

$158.29M

ASRT:

$102.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

XRN:

$4.76M

ASRT:

$71.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

XRN:

$65.81M

ASRT:

-$2.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRN vs. ASRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRN
XRN Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRN Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRN vs. ASRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN) and Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRNASRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.62

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

8.99

-6.35

XRN vs. ASRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the ASRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRN and ASRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRN vs. ASRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRN drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, smaller than the maximum ASRT drawdown of -99.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRN and ASRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRNASRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.92%

-99.60%

+40.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-37.96%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.20%

-90.66%

+51.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.92%

-93.03%

+34.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.27%

-98.82%

+55.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-63.04%

+39.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.52%

15.27%

-6.75%

Volatility

XRN vs. ASRT - Volatility Comparison

Chiron Real Estate Inc. (XRN) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT) at 0.68%. This indicates that XRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRNASRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

0.68%

+6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.87%

39.54%

-17.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.08%

55.92%

-24.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.88%

79.51%

-50.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.20%

83.79%

-49.59%

Dividends

XRN vs. ASRT - Dividend Comparison

XRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, while ASRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ASRT
Assertio Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRN
Chiron Real Estate Inc.
6.74%9.78%10.88%7.57%8.86%4.62%6.13%6.05%9.00%9.76%4.48%

Financials

XRN vs. ASRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chiron Real Estate Inc. and Assertio Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
38.06M
9.93M
(XRN) Total Revenue
(ASRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


XRN and ASRT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRN has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to ASRT (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRN dropped -58.92% vs ASRT's -99.60%.

ASRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRN and ASRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer