NMFIX vs. NOCBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NMFIX (Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund) and NOCBX (Northern Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - NMFIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Northern Funds, while NOCBX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Northern Funds. Over the past 10 years, NMFIX returned 7.38%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for NOCBX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NMFIX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for NOCBX.

Performance

NMFIX vs. NOCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than NOCBX's -0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFIX has outperformed NOCBX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while NOCBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.20% annualized return.

NMFIX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 8.44%
• 1Y: 16.19%
• 3Y*: 12.04%
• 5Y*: 6.93%
• 10Y*: 7.38%

NOCBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: -0.01%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 5.04%
• 3Y*: 3.36%
• 5Y*: -0.53%
• 10Y*: 1.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMFIX vs. NOCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	8.64%	23.11%	1.74%	6.62%	-7.21%	13.68%	-2.59%	24.34%	-10.26%	22.17%
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund	-0.01%	6.17%	1.10%	5.07%	-14.51%	-1.62%	7.32%	9.76%	-1.03%	4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NMFIX and NOCBX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2013	0.11

Over the past year, NMFIX and NOCBX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

NMFIX vs. NOCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMFIX

NMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
NMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
NMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
NMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

NOCBX

NOCBX Risk / Return Rank: 20
NOCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NOCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NOCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
NOCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
NOCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMFIX vs. NOCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NMFIX	NOCBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.03	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.24	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	1.61	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	4.86	+2.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NMFIX vs. NOCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the NOCBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFIX and NOCBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMFIX	NOCBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	-0.09	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.24	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.70	-0.17

Drawdowns

NMFIX vs. NOCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, which is greater than NOCBX's maximum drawdown of -20.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and NOCBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMFIX	NOCBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.93%	-20.02%	-14.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.20%	-3.17%	-4.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-6.61%	-8.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.76%	-19.95%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.93%	-20.02%	-14.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	-5.17%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	-2.92%	-2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.05%	+1.03%

Volatility

NMFIX vs. NOCBX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) at 1.46%. This indicates that NMFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMFIX	NOCBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	1.46%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	2.93%	+8.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	3.98%	+8.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.85%	6.12%	+7.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	5.07%	+10.39%

NMFIX vs. NOCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than NOCBX's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMFIX vs. NOCBX - Dividend Comparison

NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than NOCBX's 4.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	5.59%	6.03%	3.82%	2.78%	3.98%	10.13%	2.11%	2.47%	10.33%	7.71%	2.53%	2.01%
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund	4.04%	3.14%	3.82%	2.99%	1.66%	1.56%	3.58%	2.75%	3.16%	2.88%	2.05%	3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMFIX and NOCBX in my portfolio?

NMFIX and NOCBX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMFIX or NOCBX?

NMFIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to NOCBX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMFIX dropped -34.93% vs NOCBX's -20.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOCBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.