NLR vs. RING

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 12.80%/yr vs 13.85%/yr for RING. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.

Performance

NLR vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than RING's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 12.80%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.

NLR

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -5.96%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: -3.70%
• 1Y: 19.00%
• 3Y*: 29.88%
• 5Y*: 19.78%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

RING

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: -8.50%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -4.18%
• 1Y: 54.08%
• 3Y*: 44.87%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-1.81%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-5.54%	164.72%	15.98%	12.29%	-15.40%	-7.46%	24.98%	49.92%	-13.14%	10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and RING is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012	0.30

Over the past year, NLR and RING have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

NLR vs. RING - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NLR	RING
Energy	45.3%	-
Utilities	38.1%	-
Industrials	15.1%	-
Technology	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NLR vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 36
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NLR	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.20	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	1.62	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.23	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	1.59	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.41	4.45	-3.04

NLR vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NLR vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLR	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.05%	-79.47%	+14.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.72%	-35.72%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.48%	-35.72%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	-47.94%	+17.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.35%	-52.04%	+17.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.81%	-30.03%	+4.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.70%	-47.36%	+11.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.33%	12.74%	+0.59%

Volatility

NLR vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) is 13.73%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that NLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLR	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.73%	16.83%	-3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.75%	39.11%	-5.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.85%	47.31%	-4.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.56%	36.81%	-7.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.22%	36.70%	-12.48%

NLR vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLR vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than RING's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.60%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.89%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NLR and RING in my portfolio?

NLR and RING have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NLR or RING?

RING has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to NLR (13.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs RING's -79.47%.

Which ETF is better, NLR or RING?

On 10-year performance, RING leads with 13.85% vs 12.80% for NLR. On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, NLR has been the lower-risk option at 13.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NLR or RING?

Over the 10-year period, RING has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NLR or RING?

RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NLR or RING?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.89% for RING.

What is the main difference between NLR and RING?

NLR is categorized as Uranium, while RING is Gold. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.39% for RING.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.