NEO.TO vs. SSRM
NEO.TO (Neo Performance Materials Inc.) and SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — NEO.TO in Specialty Chemicals, SSRM in Gold. Over the past 5 years, NEO.TO returned 17.11%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for SSRM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NEO.TO vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NEO.TO is traded in CAD, while SSRM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SSRM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEO.TO achieves a 116.40% return, which is significantly higher than SSRM's 26.74% return.
NEO.TO
- 1D
- 4.68%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 116.40%
- 6M
- 109.31%
- 1Y
- 186.63%
- 3Y*
- 63.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.11%
- 10Y*
- —
SSRM
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- -11.68%
- YTD
- 26.74%
- 6M
- 24.35%
- 1Y
- 120.16%
- 3Y*
- 27.03%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
NEO.TO vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc. | 116.40% | 101.35% | 10.42% | -16.66% | -51.09% | 50.37% | 16.30% | -17.14% | -12.01% | 2.46% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 26.74% | 200.56% | -29.84% | -31.61% | -4.32% | -10.94% | 1.94% | 52.74% | 49.11% | 9.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEO.TO and SSRM is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017 | 0.15 |
The correlation between NEO.TO and SSRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NEO.TO:
CA$1.40B
SSRM:
$5.93B
NEO.TO:
-$0.24
SSRM:
$3.27
NEO.TO:
2.00
SSRM:
3.11
NEO.TO:
2.61
SSRM:
1.34
NEO.TO:
$511.45M
SSRM:
$1.90B
NEO.TO:
$147.42M
SSRM:
$643.76M
NEO.TO:
$61.97M
SSRM:
$835.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEO.TO vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank
NEO.TO
SSRM
NEO.TO vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEO.TO | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.31 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | 4.08 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 10.20 | +1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEO.TO vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.44%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO.TO and SSRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEO.TO | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.44% | -90.12% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -30.57% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.56% | -73.46% | +35.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.44% | -81.91% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -22.17% | +16.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -53.20% | +18.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.82% | 12.20% | +3.62% |
Volatility
NEO.TO vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison
Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) has a higher volatility of 26.26% compared to SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) at 19.30%. This indicates that NEO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEO.TO | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.26% | 19.30% | +6.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.29% | 54.31% | -9.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.47% | 66.63% | -2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.64% | 56.23% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.44% | 53.30% | -0.86% |
Dividends
NEO.TO vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison
NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc. | 1.19% | 2.57% | 5.01% | 5.24% | 4.17% | 1.97% | 2.90% | 3.20% | 2.47% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NEO.TO vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NEO.TO vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison
NEO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.82M and revenue of 152.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.
SSRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NEO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported an operating income of 26.12M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
SSRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.
NEO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a net income of -1.62M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in a net margin of -1.1%.
SSRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEO.TO and SSRM have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NEO.TO and SSRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer