PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METC vs. METCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

METC vs. METCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -25.50% return, which is significantly lower than METCB's -18.59% return.


METC

1D
-4.15%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
-25.50%
6M
-13.82%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
23.09%
5Y*
24.30%
10Y*

METCB

1D
-3.21%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
-18.59%
6M
-9.76%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
0.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METC vs. METCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
-25.50%94.40%-37.24%83.95%
METCB
Ramaco Resources Inc.
-18.59%25.90%-17.35%55.26%

Correlation

The correlation between METC and METCB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.51

The correlation between METC and METCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

METC:

-$1.62

METCB:

-$0.96

PS Ratio

METC:

0.96

METCB:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

METC:

$523.58M

METCB:

$523.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

METC:

$10.83M

METCB:

-$7.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

METC:

$723.00K

METCB:

$724.00K

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METC vs. METCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METC
METC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
METC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
METC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
METC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
METC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

METCB
METCB Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
METCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
METCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
METCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
METCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METC vs. METCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METCMETCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.12

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.45

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.40

0.69

-0.29

METC vs. METCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METC Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the METCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METC and METCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METC vs. METCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than METCB's maximum drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and METCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METCMETCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

-56.34%

-30.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.80%

-56.34%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.80%

-56.34%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.42%

-55.86%

-19.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.09%

-29.53%

-22.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.59%

36.93%

+18.66%

Volatility

METC vs. METCB - Volatility Comparison

Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB) have volatilities of 22.81% and 23.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METCMETCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.81%

23.17%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.10%

47.21%

+14.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.23%

80.59%

+21.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.35%

66.30%

+16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.86%

66.30%

+9.56%

Dividends

METC vs. METCB - Dividend Comparison

Neither METC nor METCB has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
0.00%1.10%5.32%2.91%5.11%
METCB
Ramaco Resources Inc.
0.00%3.18%9.36%3.11%0.00%

Financials

METC vs. METCB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Ramaco Resources Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
121.61M
121.61M
(METC) Total Revenue
(METCB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

METC vs. METCB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Ramaco Resources Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
METC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

METCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

METC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.

METCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.

METC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.

METCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


METC and METCB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

METCB has higher volatility (23.17%) compared to METC (22.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METC dropped -86.53% vs METCB's -56.34%.

METCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METC and METCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer