METC vs. SXC
METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.) and SXC (SunCoke Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Coking Coal industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 5 years, METC returned 14.06%/yr vs 6.63%/yr for SXC. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
METC vs. SXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -44.63% return, which is significantly lower than SXC's 21.42% return.
METC
- 1D
- -6.24%
- 1M
- -23.03%
- 6M
- -48.91%
- YTD
- -44.63%
- 1Y
- -47.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.86%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.44%
SXC
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- YTD
- 21.42%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- -0.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.38M | $18.24M | $21.50M | |
| $18.27M | $13.32M | $13.77M |
METC vs. SXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -44.63% | 94.40% | -37.24% | 105.93% | -32.97% | 372.22% | -19.55% | -27.68% | -28.05% | -52.71% |
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. | 21.42% | -28.61% | 3.95% | 29.77% | 35.86% | 56.87% | -25.81% | -26.25% | -28.69% | 32.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between METC and SXC is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.42 |
The correlation between METC and SXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
METC:
$493.39M
SXC:
$719.56M
METC:
-$1.82
SXC:
-$0.64
METC:
0.58
SXC:
0.38
METC:
$523.58M
SXC:
$1.90B
METC:
$10.83M
SXC:
$150.60M
METC:
$723.00K
SXC:
$130.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METC vs. SXC — Risk / Return Rank
METC
SXC
METC vs. SXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METC | SXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.13 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.70 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 1.49 | -2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METC vs. SXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, roughly equal to the maximum SXC drawdown of -90.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and SXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METC | SXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -90.41% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.73% | -32.04% | -49.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.73% | -51.99% | -29.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.73% | -51.99% | -29.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.73% | -49.18% | -32.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -48.79% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.24% | 15.02% | +46.22% |
Volatility
METC vs. SXC - Volatility Comparison
Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 20.02% compared to SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) at 12.70%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METC | SXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.02% | 12.70% | +7.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.66% | 32.83% | +20.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.86% | 43.30% | +46.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.53% | 39.45% | +43.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.73% | 52.40% | +23.33% |
Dividends
METC vs. SXC - Dividend Comparison
METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.33%, more than SXC's 5.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 11.33% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. | 5.66% | 6.67% | 4.11% | 3.35% | 3.24% | 3.64% | 5.52% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.48% |
Financials
METC vs. SXC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and SunCoke Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
METC vs. SXC - Profitability Comparison
METC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.50M and revenue of 475.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.7%.
METC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.
SXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.00M and revenue of 475.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
METC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
SXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 13.10M and revenue of 475.30M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
METC and SXC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METC has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to SXC (12.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METC dropped -86.53% vs SXC's -90.41%.
SXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METC and SXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer