PortfoliosLab logo
METC vs. ARMK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between METC and ARMK is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

METC vs. ARMK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Aramark (ARMK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

METC:

-0.33

ARMK:

0.62

Sortino Ratio

METC:

-0.04

ARMK:

1.10

Omega Ratio

METC:

0.99

ARMK:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

METC:

-0.39

ARMK:

0.64

Martin Ratio

METC:

-0.92

ARMK:

1.80

Ulcer Index

METC:

29.05%

ARMK:

9.87%

Daily Std Dev

METC:

77.78%

ARMK:

29.92%

Max Drawdown

METC:

-85.54%

ARMK:

-72.27%

Current Drawdown

METC:

-56.51%

ARMK:

-6.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

METC:

$499.79M

ARMK:

$10.29B

EPS

METC:

-$0.08

ARMK:

$1.33

PEG Ratio

METC:

0.00

ARMK:

1.57

PS Ratio

METC:

0.80

ARMK:

0.58

PB Ratio

METC:

1.44

ARMK:

3.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

METC:

$628.27M

ARMK:

$17.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

METC:

$104.33M

ARMK:

$1.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

METC:

$63.78M

ARMK:

$1.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -7.72% return, which is significantly lower than ARMK's 5.77% return.


METC

YTD

-7.72%

1M

-5.47%

6M

-22.08%

1Y

-27.33%

5Y*

41.24%

10Y*

N/A

ARMK

YTD

5.77%

1M

22.33%

6M

5.90%

1Y

19.10%

5Y*

17.73%

10Y*

6.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

METC vs. ARMK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of METC is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of METC is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of METC is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of METC is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of METC is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of METC is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARMK is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARMK is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARMK is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARMK is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARMK is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARMK is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

METC vs. ARMK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Aramark (ARMK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current METC Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the ARMK Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METC and ARMK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

METC vs. ARMK - Dividend Comparison

METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than ARMK's 1.04% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
4.39%3.98%2.86%6.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARMK
Aramark
1.04%1.05%1.19%1.06%1.19%1.14%1.01%1.47%0.97%1.09%1.09%1.00%

Drawdowns

METC vs. ARMK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than ARMK's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and ARMK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

METC vs. ARMK - Volatility Comparison

Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 19.70% compared to Aramark (ARMK) at 10.78%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

METC vs. ARMK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Aramark. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
134.66M
4.28B
(METC) Total Revenue
(ARMK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

METC vs. ARMK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Aramark over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
15.2%
8.4%
(METC) Gross Margin
(ARMK) Gross Margin
METC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.52M and revenue of 134.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.2%.

ARMK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported a gross profit of 359.65M and revenue of 4.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.4%.

METC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -12.02M and revenue of 134.66M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.9%.

ARMK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported an operating income of 174.18M and revenue of 4.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

METC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -9.46M and revenue of 134.66M, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.

ARMK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported a net income of 61.85M and revenue of 4.28B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.