METC vs. ARMK
METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.) and ARMK (Aramark) are both stocks. METC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials), while ARMK operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, METC returned 30.45%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for ARMK. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
METC vs. ARMK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than ARMK's 47.73% return.
METC
- 1D
- 6.25%
- 1M
- 18.46%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 98.19%
- 3Y*
- 38.86%
- 5Y*
- 30.45%
- 10Y*
- —
ARMK
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 20.77%
- YTD
- 47.73%
- 6M
- 47.44%
- 1Y
- 36.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.05%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
METC vs. ARMK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -2.67% | 94.40% | -37.24% | 105.93% | -32.97% | 372.22% | -19.55% | -27.68% | -28.05% | -49.23% |
ARMK Aramark | 47.73% | -0.08% | 34.28% | -4.71% | 13.54% | -3.04% | -10.01% | 51.69% | -31.47% | 27.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between METC and ARMK is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2017 | 0.17 |
The correlation between METC and ARMK shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
METC:
-$1.62
ARMK:
$1.34
METC:
1.25
ARMK:
0.74
METC:
$523.58M
ARMK:
$19.41B
METC:
$10.83M
ARMK:
$1.25B
METC:
$723.00K
ARMK:
$1.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METC vs. ARMK — Risk / Return Rank
METC
ARMK
METC vs. ARMK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Aramark (ARMK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METC | ARMK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.41 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 2.01 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.94 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | 3.65 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METC | ARMK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.41 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.59 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.33 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
METC vs. ARMK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than ARMK's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and ARMK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METC | ARMK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -72.27% | -13.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.80% | -18.15% | -57.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.80% | -27.63% | -48.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.80% | -27.63% | -48.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.88% | -0.42% | -67.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.60% | -12.95% | -37.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.08% | 9.67% | +43.41% |
Volatility
METC vs. ARMK - Volatility Comparison
Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 22.77% compared to Aramark (ARMK) at 10.98%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METC | ARMK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.77% | 10.98% | +11.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.84% | 19.85% | +42.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.77% | 25.94% | +75.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.13% | 29.02% | +53.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.88% | 36.75% | +39.13% |
Dividends
METC vs. ARMK - Dividend Comparison
METC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | 0.86% | 1.18% | 1.05% | 1.19% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 1.47% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.10% |
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
METC vs. ARMK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Aramark. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
METC vs. ARMK - Profitability Comparison
METC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ARMK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported a gross profit of 294.23M and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.
METC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.
ARMK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported an operating income of 219.75M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
METC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
ARMK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported a net income of 101.95M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
METC and ARMK have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METC has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to ARMK (10.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METC dropped -85.54% vs ARMK's -72.27%.
ARMK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METC and ARMK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer