PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
METC vs. ARMK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between METC and ARMK is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

METC vs. ARMK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Aramark (ARMK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-26.01%
15.31%
METC
ARMK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

METC:

-0.83

ARMK:

1.52

Sortino Ratio

METC:

-1.17

ARMK:

2.17

Omega Ratio

METC:

0.86

ARMK:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

METC:

-0.85

ARMK:

2.60

Martin Ratio

METC:

-1.38

ARMK:

8.82

Ulcer Index

METC:

36.15%

ARMK:

4.10%

Daily Std Dev

METC:

60.22%

ARMK:

23.82%

Max Drawdown

METC:

-85.53%

ARMK:

-72.27%

Current Drawdown

METC:

-55.43%

ARMK:

-8.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

METC:

$499.13M

ARMK:

$10.22B

EPS

METC:

$0.68

ARMK:

$0.99

PE Ratio

METC:

14.26

ARMK:

38.98

PEG Ratio

METC:

0.00

ARMK:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

METC:

$495.40M

ARMK:

$12.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

METC:

$81.96M

ARMK:

$845.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

METC:

$59.90M

ARMK:

$920.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -5.46% return, which is significantly lower than ARMK's 3.43% return.


METC

YTD

-5.46%

1M

-5.37%

6M

-26.01%

1Y

-47.67%

5Y*

30.85%

10Y*

N/A

ARMK

YTD

3.43%

1M

2.58%

6M

15.32%

1Y

36.32%

5Y*

4.04%

10Y*

6.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

METC vs. ARMK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of METC is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of METC is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of METC is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of METC is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of METC is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of METC is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARMK is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARMK is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARMK is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARMK is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARMK is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARMK is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

METC vs. ARMK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Aramark (ARMK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for METC, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.831.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for METC, currently valued at -1.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.172.17
The chart of Omega ratio for METC, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.861.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for METC, currently valued at -0.85, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.852.60
The chart of Martin ratio for METC, currently valued at -1.38, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.388.82
METC
ARMK

The current METC Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the ARMK Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METC and ARMK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.83
1.52
METC
ARMK

Dividends

METC vs. ARMK - Dividend Comparison

METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than ARMK's 1.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
4.24%4.01%2.90%6.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARMK
Aramark
1.01%1.05%1.19%1.06%1.19%1.14%1.01%1.47%0.97%1.09%1.09%1.00%

Drawdowns

METC vs. ARMK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.53%, which is greater than ARMK's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and ARMK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-55.43%
-8.36%
METC
ARMK

Volatility

METC vs. ARMK - Volatility Comparison

Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 14.43% compared to Aramark (ARMK) at 6.24%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
14.43%
6.24%
METC
ARMK

Financials

METC vs. ARMK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Aramark. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab