METC vs. ARMK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Aramark (ARMK).

Performance

METC vs. ARMK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Aramark (ARMK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

METC vs. ARMK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc.	-14.11%	94.40%	-37.24%	105.93%	-32.97%	372.22%	-19.55%	-27.68%	-28.05%	-49.23%
ARMK Aramark	10.32%	-0.08%	34.28%	-4.71%	13.54%	-3.04%	-10.01%	51.69%	-31.47%	27.01%

Fundamentals

EPS METC : -$1.55 ARMK : $1.19
PS Ratio METC : 0.96 ARMK : 0.58
Total Revenue (TTM) METC : $536.62M ARMK : $18.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) METC : $5.58M ARMK : $1.02B
EBITDA (TTM) METC : $20.61M ARMK : $1.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -14.11% return, which is significantly lower than ARMK's 10.32% return.

METC

• 1D: 7.14%
• 1M: 2.11%
• YTD: -14.11%
• 6M: -53.42%
• 1Y: 102.29%
• 3Y*: 28.59%
• 5Y*: 34.92%
• 10Y*: —

ARMK

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 6.24%
• 1Y: 18.81%
• 3Y*: 17.54%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

METC vs. ARMK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METC

METC Risk / Return Rank: 72
METC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
METC Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
METC Omega Ratio Rank: 72
METC Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
METC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

ARMK

ARMK Risk / Return Rank: 62
ARMK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ARMK Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ARMK Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ARMK Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ARMK Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METC vs. ARMK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Aramark (ARMK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METC	ARMK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	0.64	+0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.11	+0.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.16	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	1.10	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.37	2.01	+0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METC vs. ARMK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METC Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the ARMK Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METC and ARMK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METC	ARMK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	0.64	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.32	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.26	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between METC and ARMK is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

METC vs. ARMK - Dividend Comparison

METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than ARMK's 1.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc.	0.44%	1.10%	5.32%	2.91%	5.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ARMK Aramark	1.11%	1.18%	1.05%	1.19%	1.06%	1.19%	1.14%	1.01%	1.47%	0.97%	1.09%	1.10%

Drawdowns

METC vs. ARMK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than ARMK's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and ARMK.

Drawdown Indicators

	METC	ARMK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.54%	-72.27%	-13.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.34%	-18.15%	-57.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.34%	-27.63%	-47.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.66%	-7.35%	-64.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.18%	-13.11%	-37.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.84%	9.90%	+33.94%

Volatility

METC vs. ARMK - Volatility Comparison

Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 23.92% compared to Aramark (ARMK) at 7.26%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METC	ARMK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.92%	7.26%	+16.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.68%	17.95%	+52.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.11%	29.58%	+73.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.38%	28.71%	+53.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.99%	36.54%	+39.45%

Financials

METC vs. ARMK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Aramark over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

METC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 128.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ARMK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aramark reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

METC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -15.61M and revenue of 128.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.2%.

ARMK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aramark reported an operating income of 217.55M and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

METC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -14.71M and revenue of 128.01M, resulting in a net margin of -11.5%.

ARMK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aramark reported a net income of 96.16M and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.