METC vs. NU
METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.) and NU (Nu Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. METC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials), while NU operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, METC returned 23.09%/yr vs 19.16%/yr for NU. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
METC vs. NU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -25.50% return, which is significantly lower than NU's -23.60% return.
METC
- 1D
- -4.15%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- -25.50%
- 6M
- -13.82%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.09%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- —
NU
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- -23.60%
- 6M
- -23.04%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METC vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -25.50% | 94.40% | -37.24% | 105.93% | -32.97% | 13.14% |
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | -23.60% | 61.58% | 24.37% | 104.67% | -56.61% | -16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between METC and NU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
METC:
-$1.62
NU:
$0.65
METC:
0.96
NU:
3.58
METC:
$523.58M
NU:
$17.54B
METC:
$10.83M
NU:
$7.67B
METC:
$723.00K
NU:
$4.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METC vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank
METC
NU
METC vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METC | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.06 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 0.14 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 0.33 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METC vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and NU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METC | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -72.07% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.80% | -38.17% | -37.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.80% | -39.58% | -36.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.42% | -31.82% | -43.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.09% | -29.78% | -22.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.59% | 16.02% | +39.57% |
Volatility
METC vs. NU - Volatility Comparison
Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 22.81% compared to Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) at 13.41%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METC | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.81% | 13.41% | +9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.10% | 28.95% | +33.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.23% | 38.22% | +64.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.35% | 58.38% | +23.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.86% | 58.38% | +17.48% |
Dividends
METC vs. NU - Dividend Comparison
Neither METC nor NU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% |
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
METC vs. NU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
METC vs. NU - Profitability Comparison
METC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
METC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.
NU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.
METC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
NU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
METC and NU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METC has higher volatility (22.81%) compared to NU (13.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METC dropped -86.53% vs NU's -72.07%.
METC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METC and NU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer