PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
METC vs. NU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


METCNU
YTD Return-24.69%90.76%
1Y Return-25.38%86.50%
Sharpe Ratio-0.302.49
Sortino Ratio-0.033.04
Omega Ratio1.001.39
Calmar Ratio-0.322.74
Martin Ratio-0.5314.87
Ulcer Index34.77%6.21%
Daily Std Dev61.26%37.11%
Max Drawdown-85.53%-72.07%
Current Drawdown-42.24%0.00%

Fundamentals


METCNU
Market Cap$645.89M$76.10B
EPS$0.64$0.31
PE Ratio19.6451.26
Total Revenue (TTM)$698.13M$7.18B
Gross Profit (TTM)$146.75M$5.01B
EBITDA (TTM)$102.38M$1.92B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between METC and NU is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

METC vs. NU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -24.69% return, which is significantly lower than NU's 90.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.81%
39.63%
METC
NU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

METC vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for METC, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for METC, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for METC, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for METC, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for METC, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.53
NU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NU, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.49
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NU, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NU, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NU, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NU, currently valued at 14.87, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.87

METC vs. NU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METC Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the NU Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METC and NU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.30
2.49
METC
NU

Dividends

METC vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
4.29%2.91%6.29%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

METC vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.53%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and NU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-42.24%
0
METC
NU

Volatility

METC vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 17.64% compared to Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) at 12.38%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.64%
12.38%
METC
NU

Financials

METC vs. NU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items