METC vs. NU

In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than NU's 15.93% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current METC Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the NU Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METC and NU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.53%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and NU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 28.27% compared to Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) at 17.67%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.