PortfoliosLab logo
METC vs. NU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between METC and NU is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

METC vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

METC:

-0.27

NU:

0.32

Sortino Ratio

METC:

0.05

NU:

0.63

Omega Ratio

METC:

1.01

NU:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

METC:

-0.33

NU:

0.29

Martin Ratio

METC:

-0.80

NU:

0.60

Ulcer Index

METC:

28.75%

NU:

19.22%

Daily Std Dev

METC:

77.36%

NU:

48.28%

Max Drawdown

METC:

-85.54%

NU:

-72.07%

Current Drawdown

METC:

-53.85%

NU:

-17.31%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

METC:

$477.11M

NU:

$62.40B

EPS

METC:

$0.11

NU:

$0.40

PE Ratio

METC:

81.82

NU:

32.38

PS Ratio

METC:

0.76

NU:

11.32

PB Ratio

METC:

1.45

NU:

8.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

METC:

$628.27M

NU:

$11.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

METC:

$83.81M

NU:

$5.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

METC:

$63.78M

NU:

$3.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than NU's 26.83% return.


METC

YTD

-2.09%

1M

13.79%

6M

-15.08%

1Y

-20.74%

5Y*

48.25%

10Y*

N/A

NU

YTD

26.83%

1M

24.55%

6M

-17.05%

1Y

15.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

METC vs. NU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of METC is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of METC is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of METC is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of METC is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of METC is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of METC is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NU is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NU is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NU is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NU is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NU is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NU is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

METC vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current METC Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the NU Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METC and NU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

METC vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
4.12%3.95%2.85%6.14%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

METC vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and NU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

METC vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 19.08% compared to Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) at 7.26%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

METC vs. NU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
134.66M
2.86B
(METC) Total Revenue
(NU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items