PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIX vs. ABT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NBIX vs. ABT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIX achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's -14.06% return. Over the past 10 years, NBIX has outperformed ABT with an annualized return of 12.76%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.


NBIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-4.71%
6M
19.48%
YTD
17.08%
1Y
29.69%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
9.09%

ABT

1D
0.24%
1M
11.33%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-14.06%
1Y
-17.24%
3Y*
1.49%
5Y*
-0.94%
10Y*
10.92%
ALL TIME*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.04B$1.20B$1.18B
$283.74M$232.21M$210.21M

NBIX vs. ABT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
17.08%3.90%3.60%10.31%40.24%-11.14%-10.83%50.53%-7.96%100.49%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
-14.06%12.87%4.81%2.26%-20.68%30.53%28.04%22.08%29.06%52.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIX and ABT is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 1996

0.22

The correlation between NBIX and ABT shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NBIX:

$16.70B

ABT:

$182.83B

EPS

NBIX:

$6.84

ABT:

$3.11

PE Ratio

NBIX:

24.28

ABT:

34.03

PEG Ratio

NBIX:

0.48

ABT:

2.12

PS Ratio

NBIX:

5.08

ABT:

3.96

PB Ratio

NBIX:

4.34

ABT:

2.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBIX:

$3.37B

ABT:

$46.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBIX:

$3.31B

ABT:

$26.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

NBIX:

$940.50M

ABT:

$9.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIX vs. ABT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBIX
NBIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ABT
ABT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ABT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ABT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBIX vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBIXABTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.90

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.45

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

-0.85

+3.98

NBIX vs. ABT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the ABT Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIX and ABT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIX vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIX drawdown since its inception was -97.21%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIX and ABT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIXABTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.21%

-45.66%

-51.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.90%

-38.61%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.89%

-39.64%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.89%

-39.64%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.39%

-39.64%

-6.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.48%

-22.16%

+11.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.65%

-10.90%

-32.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.52%

20.29%

-10.77%

Volatility

NBIX vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) has a higher volatility of 13.54% compared to Abbott Laboratories (ABT) at 12.53%. This indicates that NBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIXABTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.54%

12.53%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.95%

21.02%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.14%

26.47%

+6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.09%

22.91%

+10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.19%

23.96%

+15.23%

Dividends

NBIX vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison

NBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
2.35%1.88%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NBIX vs. ABT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NBIX vs. ABT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NBIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 935.80M and revenue of 959.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.6%.

ABT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 7.30B and revenue of 12.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.

NBIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 151.50M and revenue of 959.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

ABT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.78B and revenue of 12.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

NBIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported a net income of 144.40M and revenue of 959.00M, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

ABT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 928.00M and revenue of 12.59B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NBIX and ABT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIX has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to ABT (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIX dropped -97.21% vs ABT's -45.66%.

NBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIX and ABT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer