ABT vs. DHR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Danaher Corporation (DHR).

Performance

ABT vs. DHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABT vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABT Abbott Laboratories	-17.64%	12.87%	4.81%	2.26%	-20.68%	30.53%	28.04%	22.08%	29.06%	52.03%
DHR Danaher Corporation	-17.00%	0.35%	-0.35%	-1.22%	-19.02%	48.57%	45.34%	49.55%	11.80%	20.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ABT : $179.36B DHR : $134.81B
EPS ABT : $3.73 DHR : $5.06
PE Ratio ABT : 27.52 DHR : 37.49
PS Ratio ABT : 4.05 DHR : 5.51
PB Ratio ABT : 3.44 DHR : 2.57
Total Revenue (TTM) ABT : $44.33B DHR : $24.57B
Gross Profit (TTM) ABT : $24.61B DHR : $14.97B
EBITDA (TTM) ABT : $11.33B DHR : $7.02B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ABT having a -17.64% return and DHR slightly higher at -17.00%. Over the past 10 years, ABT has underperformed DHR with an annualized return of 11.37%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.

ABT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -11.76%
• YTD: -17.64%
• 6M: -22.62%
• 1Y: -21.15%
• 3Y*: 2.45%
• 5Y*: -1.11%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

DHR

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -9.80%
• YTD: -17.00%
• 6M: -4.03%
• 1Y: -6.87%
• 3Y*: -4.81%
• 5Y*: -0.55%
• 10Y*: 12.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ABT vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABT

ABT Risk / Return Rank: 8
ABT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ABT Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ABT Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ABT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ABT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

DHR

DHR Risk / Return Rank: 30
DHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
DHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
DHR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
DHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
DHR Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABT vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABT	DHR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	-0.21	-0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.12	-0.09	-1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	0.99	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.29	-0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.02	-0.87	-1.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABT vs. DHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABT Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the DHR Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABT and DHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABT	DHR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.92	-0.21	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	-0.02	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.48	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.65	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between ABT and DHR is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ABT vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison

ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than DHR's 0.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABT Abbott Laboratories	2.34%	1.88%	1.95%	1.85%	1.71%	1.28%	1.32%	1.47%	1.55%	1.86%	2.71%	2.14%
DHR Danaher Corporation	0.72%	0.56%	0.47%	12.64%	0.38%	0.26%	0.32%	0.44%	0.62%	0.60%	32.55%	0.58%

Drawdowns

ABT vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and DHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABT	DHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.57%	-45.80%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.18%	-24.85%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.88%	-39.81%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.88%	-39.81%	+5.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.41%	-34.20%	+8.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-10.08%	-4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.94%	8.34%	+1.60%

Volatility

ABT vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is 5.95%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that ABT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABT	DHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.95%	8.93%	-2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.83%	20.17%	-3.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.14%	32.45%	-9.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.98%	27.75%	-5.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.57%	25.24%	-1.67%

Financials

ABT vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Abbott Laboratories and Danaher Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ABT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 6.54B and revenue of 11.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.1%.

DHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.97B and revenue of 6.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.

ABT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

DHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 6.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.

ABT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.78B and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.

DHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.