ABT vs. DHR
Compare and contrast key facts about Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Danaher Corporation (DHR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ABT or DHR.
Correlation
The correlation between ABT and DHR is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
ABT vs. DHR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ABT:
0.69
DHR:
-0.97
ABT:
1.12
DHR:
-1.26
ABT:
1.14
DHR:
0.83
ABT:
0.55
DHR:
-0.68
ABT:
2.94
DHR:
-1.82
ABT:
4.80%
DHR:
13.90%
ABT:
20.42%
DHR:
26.00%
ABT:
-45.62%
DHR:
-65.30%
ABT:
-11.25%
DHR:
-37.36%
Fundamentals
ABT:
$215.82B
DHR:
$130.05B
ABT:
$7.64
DHR:
$5.29
ABT:
16.29
DHR:
34.36
ABT:
4.17
DHR:
1.81
ABT:
$31.99B
DHR:
$18.08B
ABT:
$17.78B
DHR:
$10.72B
ABT:
$8.53B
DHR:
$4.83B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -20.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has underperformed DHR with an annualized return of 12.57%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.98% annualized return.
ABT
10.59%
-9.64%
11.58%
15.32%
11.36%
12.57%
DHR
-20.69%
-13.54%
-32.50%
-24.50%
9.15%
17.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ABT vs. DHR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ABT
DHR
ABT vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ABT vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison
ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than DHR's 0.62% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 1.80% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.62% | 0.47% | 0.43% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 36.46% | 0.80% | 0.47% |
Drawdowns
ABT vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -45.62%, smaller than the maximum DHR drawdown of -65.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and DHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ABT vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is 8.82%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that ABT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ABT vs. DHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
User Portfolios with ABT or DHR
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
calculation of performance
Portfolio performance graph for past 1Y (thru 3/13/2025):
GLD=37.82%
IAU=37.97%
IAUM=38.34%
using daily adjusted closing market price (from NASDAQ) integrating the logarithmic daily rate of return between 3/13/2025 to 3/14/2025 to calculate the cumulative rate of return, I calculate
GLD=31.34%
IAU=31.45%
IAUM=31.66%
These ETF's do not pay a dividend, Expense cost is included in the closing price.
The difference in rate of return is about 6%, which is too large. I can send you my calculation (xls) if this would be useful.
What is causing the error?
Marcus Crahan
Transactional Portfolio Use
I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.
The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?
EG