PortfoliosLab logo
ABT vs. DHR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ABT and DHR is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ABT vs. DHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABT:

1.46

DHR:

-0.84

Sortino Ratio

ABT:

2.01

DHR:

-1.03

Omega Ratio

ABT:

1.26

DHR:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

ABT:

1.10

DHR:

-0.59

Martin Ratio

ABT:

6.72

DHR:

-1.38

Ulcer Index

ABT:

4.17%

DHR:

16.95%

Daily Std Dev

ABT:

20.56%

DHR:

28.86%

Max Drawdown

ABT:

-45.66%

DHR:

-65.30%

Current Drawdown

ABT:

-4.54%

DHR:

-34.62%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABT:

$233.14B

DHR:

$135.78B

EPS

ABT:

$7.70

DHR:

$5.16

PE Ratio

ABT:

17.30

DHR:

36.77

PEG Ratio

ABT:

4.17

DHR:

1.91

PS Ratio

ABT:

5.47

DHR:

5.85

PB Ratio

ABT:

4.78

DHR:

2.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABT:

$42.34B

DHR:

$23.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABT:

$23.67B

DHR:

$14.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABT:

$11.20B

DHR:

$7.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a 18.96% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -17.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has underperformed DHR with an annualized return of 13.14%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.23% annualized return.


ABT

YTD

18.96%

1M

7.52%

6M

15.41%

1Y

29.77%

5Y*

8.70%

10Y*

13.14%

DHR

YTD

-17.22%

1M

4.96%

6M

-22.47%

1Y

-24.76%

5Y*

6.21%

10Y*

18.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABT vs. DHR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABT is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABT is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABT is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABT is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABT is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABT is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DHR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DHR is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DHR is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DHR is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DHR is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DHR is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DHR is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ABT vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ABT Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the DHR Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABT and DHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ABT vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison

ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than DHR's 0.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
1.71%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%1.95%
DHR
Danaher Corporation
0.60%0.47%0.43%0.38%0.26%0.32%0.44%0.62%0.60%36.46%0.80%0.47%

Drawdowns

ABT vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum DHR drawdown of -65.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and DHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ABT vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is 5.15%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that ABT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ABT vs. DHR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20212022202320242025
10.36B
5.74B
(ABT) Total Revenue
(DHR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABT vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Abbott Laboratories and Danaher Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

52.0%54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%62.0%20212022202320242025
56.9%
61.2%
(ABT) Gross Margin
(DHR) Gross Margin
ABT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 5.89B and revenue of 10.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

DHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

ABT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

DHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

ABT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

DHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 954.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.