ABT vs. MDT
Compare and contrast key facts about Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Medtronic plc (MDT).
Performance
ABT vs. MDT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABT vs. MDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | -17.64% | 12.87% | 4.81% | 2.26% | -20.68% | 30.53% | 28.04% | 22.08% | 29.06% | 52.03% |
MDT Medtronic plc | -9.06% | 24.05% | 0.28% | 9.58% | -22.55% | -9.79% | 5.70% | 27.34% | 15.18% | 15.90% |
Fundamentals
ABT:
$179.36B
MDT:
$111.62B
ABT:
$3.73
MDT:
$3.58
ABT:
27.52
MDT:
24.18
ABT:
1.72
MDT:
2.18
ABT:
4.05
MDT:
3.14
ABT:
$44.33B
MDT:
$35.48B
ABT:
$24.61B
MDT:
$5.78B
ABT:
$11.33B
MDT:
$7.11B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a -17.64% return, which is significantly lower than MDT's -9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has outperformed MDT with an annualized return of 11.37%, while MDT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.10% annualized return.
ABT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -11.76%
- YTD
- -17.64%
- 6M
- -22.62%
- 1Y
- -21.15%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- -1.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
MDT
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- -9.06%
- 6M
- -7.60%
- 1Y
- -0.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- -3.11%
- 10Y*
- 4.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABT vs. MDT — Risk / Return Rank
ABT
MDT
ABT vs. MDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Medtronic plc (MDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABT | MDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | -0.02 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | 0.11 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.01 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 0.11 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.02 | 0.32 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABT | MDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.92 | -0.02 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | -0.15 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.18 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.48 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABT and MDT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ABT vs. MDT - Dividend Comparison
ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than MDT's 3.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 2.34% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% |
MDT Medtronic plc | 3.28% | 2.95% | 3.49% | 3.34% | 3.44% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.88% |
Drawdowns
ABT vs. MDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, roughly equal to the maximum MDT drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and MDT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABT | MDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.57% | -57.63% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.18% | -17.61% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.88% | -45.10% | +11.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.88% | -45.10% | +11.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.41% | -25.69% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -16.48% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.94% | 6.27% | +3.67% |
Volatility
ABT vs. MDT - Volatility Comparison
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Medtronic plc (MDT) at 5.55%. This indicates that ABT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABT | MDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 5.55% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.83% | 13.84% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.14% | 20.72% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 21.41% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 23.00% | +0.57% |
Financials
ABT vs. MDT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Medtronic plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities