PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABT vs. BDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ABT vs. BDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABT vs. BDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
-17.64%12.87%4.81%2.26%-20.68%30.53%28.04%22.08%29.06%52.03%
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
3.71%-12.61%-5.38%-2.67%5.08%1.88%-6.75%22.20%6.61%31.24%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABT:

$179.36B

BDX:

$44.82B

EPS

ABT:

$3.73

BDX:

$6.12

PE Ratio

ABT:

27.52

BDX:

25.68

PS Ratio

ABT:

4.05

BDX:

2.06

PB Ratio

ABT:

3.44

BDX:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABT:

$44.33B

BDX:

$21.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABT:

$24.61B

BDX:

$10.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABT:

$11.33B

BDX:

$5.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a -17.64% return, which is significantly lower than BDX's 3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has outperformed BDX with an annualized return of 11.37%, while BDX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.


ABT

1D
0.78%
1M
-11.76%
YTD
-17.64%
6M
-22.62%
1Y
-21.15%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-1.11%
10Y*
11.37%

BDX

1D
1.64%
1M
-10.34%
YTD
3.71%
6M
8.12%
1Y
-10.64%
3Y*
-5.12%
5Y*
-1.60%
10Y*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABT vs. BDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABT
ABT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ABT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ABT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BDX
BDX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABT vs. BDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABTBDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.92

-0.34

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.12

-0.26

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.96

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.36

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.02

-0.59

-1.43

ABT vs. BDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABT Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the BDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABT and BDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABTBDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

-0.34

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.07

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.19

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.43

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ABT and BDX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ABT vs. BDX - Dividend Comparison

ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than BDX's 2.23% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
2.34%1.88%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
2.23%2.15%1.71%1.51%1.38%1.34%1.28%1.14%1.34%1.37%1.64%1.60%

Drawdowns

ABT vs. BDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, which is greater than BDX's maximum drawdown of -51.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and BDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABTBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.57%

-51.17%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.18%

-27.06%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-40.06%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.88%

-40.06%

+6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.41%

-25.71%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-11.49%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.94%

16.97%

-7.03%

Volatility

ABT vs. BDX - Volatility Comparison

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) at 5.44%. This indicates that ABT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABTBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

5.44%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.83%

16.59%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.14%

31.36%

-8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

22.98%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

23.35%

+0.22%

Financials

ABT vs. BDX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Becton, Dickinson and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
11.46B
5.25B
(ABT) Total Revenue
(BDX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABT vs. BDX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Abbott Laboratories and Becton, Dickinson and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
57.1%
44.6%
Portfolio components
ABT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 6.54B and revenue of 11.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.1%.

BDX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported a gross profit of 2.34B and revenue of 5.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.

ABT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

BDX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported an operating income of 594.00M and revenue of 5.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

ABT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.78B and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.

BDX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported a net income of 382.00M and revenue of 5.25B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.