NANC vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
NANC and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NANC is an actively managed fund by Subversive. It was launched on Feb 7, 2023. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NANC or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| NANC | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.45% | 34.56% |
| 1Y Return | 42.58% | 44.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.98 | 2.80 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.82 | 3.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.05 | 3.87 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.48 | 15.40 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.56% | 3.10% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.00% | 16.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.06% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NANC and SCHG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NANC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 30.45% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 34.56% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NANC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NANC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NANC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF | 0.72% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
NANC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -11.06%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NANC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) is 4.40%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that NANC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.