NANC vs. MAGA
Compare and contrast key facts about Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA).
NANC and MAGA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NANC is an actively managed fund by Subversive. It was launched on Feb 7, 2023. MAGA is a passively managed fund by Point Bridge Capital that tracks the performance of the Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NANC or MAGA.
Correlation
The correlation between NANC and MAGA is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NANC vs. MAGA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NANC:
2.03
MAGA:
1.33
NANC:
2.66
MAGA:
1.96
NANC:
1.37
MAGA:
1.24
NANC:
2.79
MAGA:
1.69
NANC:
11.73
MAGA:
6.21
NANC:
2.63%
MAGA:
2.64%
NANC:
15.25%
MAGA:
12.30%
NANC:
-11.06%
MAGA:
-43.17%
NANC:
-2.33%
MAGA:
-7.76%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 30.51% return, which is significantly higher than MAGA's 15.98% return.
NANC
30.51%
0.43%
9.50%
30.90%
N/A
N/A
MAGA
15.98%
-7.02%
9.33%
16.39%
12.40%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NANC vs. MAGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGA's 0.72% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NANC vs. MAGA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NANC vs. MAGA - Dividend Comparison
Neither NANC nor MAGA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 0.00% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.69% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 2.14% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
NANC vs. MAGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -11.06%, smaller than the maximum MAGA drawdown of -43.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and MAGA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NANC vs. MAGA - Volatility Comparison
Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) at 3.86%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.