PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NANC vs. MAGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NANC vs. MAGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NANC vs. MAGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NANC
Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF
-7.53%18.54%26.83%20.79%
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
4.13%10.31%14.69%4.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a -7.53% return, which is significantly lower than MAGA's 4.13% return.


NANC

1D
3.10%
1M
-5.64%
YTD
-7.53%
6M
-5.59%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10Y*

MAGA

1D
1.21%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
4.13%
6M
3.51%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NANC vs. MAGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGA's 0.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NANC vs. MAGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANC
NANC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGA
MAGA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MAGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANC vs. MAGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NANCMAGADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.75

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

1.16

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.04

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.71

4.74

+0.97

NANC vs. MAGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANC Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the MAGA Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANC and MAGA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NANCMAGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.75

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.54

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between NANC and MAGA is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NANC vs. MAGA - Dividend Comparison

NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than MAGA's 1.54% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NANC
Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF
0.23%0.21%0.20%0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
1.54%1.61%1.18%1.60%1.33%0.69%2.59%2.19%2.14%0.43%

Drawdowns

NANC vs. MAGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum MAGA drawdown of -43.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and MAGA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NANCMAGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-43.17%

+22.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-12.91%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.49%

-4.81%

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-5.78%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.83%

+0.32%

Volatility

NANC vs. MAGA - Volatility Comparison

Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) at 3.72%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NANCMAGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

3.72%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

8.45%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.97%

16.51%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

16.39%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

20.46%

-3.60%