NANC vs. MAGA

In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than MAGA's 3.39% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGA's 0.72% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NANC Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the MAGA Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANC and MAGA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NANC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum MAGA drawdown of -43.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and MAGA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) at 5.23%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.