PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NANC vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NANC vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NANC having a 9.12% return and SWPPX slightly higher at 9.35%.


NANC

1D
1.18%
1M
-0.64%
6M
8.71%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.32%

SWPPX

1D
1.70%
1M
-0.52%
6M
7.81%
YTD
9.35%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
14.98%
ALL TIME*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$826.89K$806.25K$1.03M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NANC vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
9.12%18.54%26.83%22.81%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
9.35%17.87%24.96%17.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NANC and SWPPX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023

0.94

The correlation between NANC and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

NANC vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NANC
SWPPX

Technology

45.6%
38.5%

Communication Services

12.5%
9.9%

Healthcare

10.0%
8.9%

Financial Services

8.2%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.5%

Industrials

5.8%
8.4%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.7%

Utilities

0.6%
2.2%

Energy

-

3.0%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

NANC
45.6%
SWPPX
38.5%

Communication Services

NANC
12.5%
SWPPX
9.9%

Healthcare

NANC
10.0%
SWPPX
8.9%

Financial Services

NANC
8.2%
SWPPX
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NANC
8.2%
SWPPX
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

NANC
7.1%
SWPPX
4.5%

Industrials

NANC
5.8%
SWPPX
8.4%

Basic Materials

NANC
2.0%
SWPPX
1.7%

Utilities

NANC
0.6%
SWPPX
2.2%

Energy

NANC

-

SWPPX
3.0%

Real Estate

NANC

-

SWPPX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NANC vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NANC
NANC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NANC vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NANCSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.07

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

8.85

-3.06

NANC vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANC Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANC and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NANC vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NANCSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-55.06%

+34.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-8.89%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.94%

-18.74%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-2.09%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-9.90%

+7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.07%

+1.02%

Volatility

NANC vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 3.49%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NANCSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

3.49%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

10.13%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

12.89%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

17.05%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

18.23%

-1.42%

NANC vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

NANC vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than SWPPX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
0.19%0.21%0.20%0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.01%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NANC and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NANC has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SWPPX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANC dropped -20.94% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NANC and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer