NANC vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NANC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. NANC is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NANC returned 22.34%/yr vs 53.04%/yr for SMH. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NANC charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

NANC vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 51.46% return.

NANC

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: 1.56%
• 6M: 10.60%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 1Y: 22.52%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.03%

SMH

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -7.91%
• 6M: 33.70%
• YTD: 51.46%
• 1Y: 92.69%
• 3Y*: 53.04%
• 5Y*: 32.99%
• 10Y*: 33.99%
• ALL TIME*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	$805.69K	$811.59K	$1.02M
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.29B	$7.23B	$7.12B

NANC vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	11.53%	18.54%	26.83%	22.81%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	51.46%	49.17%	39.10%	43.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NANC and SMH is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023	0.79

The correlation between NANC and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

NANC vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NANC	SMH
Technology	45.6%	100.0%
Communication Services	12.5%	-
Healthcare	10.0%	-
Financial Services	8.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	-
Industrials	5.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.0%	-
Utilities	0.6%	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NANC vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NANC

NANC Risk / Return Rank: 59
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 88
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NANC vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NANC	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.43	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.80	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	3.79	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	15.18	-7.89

NANC vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANC Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANC and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NANC vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NANC	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.94%	-84.96%	+64.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-24.62%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.94%	-35.74%	+14.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.46%	+18.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.63%	-40.89%	+38.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	6.13%	-3.04%

Volatility

NANC vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) is 5.04%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that NANC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NANC	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	14.15%	-9.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	32.94%	-20.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.04%	38.50%	-23.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	36.51%	-19.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	33.33%	-16.49%

NANC vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NANC vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than SMH's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	0.19%	0.21%	0.20%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.20%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NANC and SMH in my portfolio?

NANC and SMH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NANC or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to NANC (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANC dropped -20.94% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, NANC or SMH?

On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 53.04% vs 22.34% for NANC. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NANC has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NANC or SMH?

Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 53.04% return vs 22.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NANC or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for NANC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NANC or SMH?

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.

What is the main difference between NANC and SMH?

NANC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for NANC and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.