PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAES vs. BBAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAES vs. BBAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly higher than BBAI's -29.07% return.


LAES

1D
-0.64%
1M
-8.28%
YTD
-17.99%
6M
-29.86%
1Y
-21.52%
3Y*
-42.20%
5Y*
10Y*

BBAI

1D
-2.30%
1M
-8.37%
YTD
-29.07%
6M
-40.06%
1Y
-4.25%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAES vs. BBAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LAES
SEALSQ Corp
-17.99%-38.54%380.47%-92.82%
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
-29.07%21.35%107.94%-12.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LAES and BBAI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023

0.31

Over the past year, LAES and BBAI have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

LAES:

-$0.43

BBAI:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

LAES:

10.21

BBAI:

68.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAES:

$35.37M

BBAI:

$127.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAES:

$13.21M

BBAI:

$32.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAES:

-$41.81M

BBAI:

-$230.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAES vs. BBAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAES
LAES Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BBAI
BBAI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BBAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAI Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAES vs. BBAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAESBBAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.07

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

-0.06

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.49

-0.11

-0.38

LAES vs. BBAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAES Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the BBAI Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAES and BBAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAES vs. BBAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, roughly equal to the maximum BBAI drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and BBAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAESBBAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.44%

-95.01%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.68%

-65.88%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.87%

-75.56%

-22.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.89%

-69.82%

-16.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.60%

-70.79%

-13.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.33%

40.07%

+4.26%

Volatility

LAES vs. BBAI - Volatility Comparison

SEALSQ Corp (LAES) has a higher volatility of 29.41% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) at 23.57%. This indicates that LAES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAESBBAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.41%

23.57%

+5.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.62%

55.71%

+9.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.50%

96.70%

+12.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

169.90%

174.27%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

169.90%

174.27%

-4.37%

Dividends

LAES vs. BBAI - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAES nor BBAI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LAES vs. BBAI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00M20.00M30.00M40.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.60M
34.44M
(LAES) Total Revenue
(BBAI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LAES and BBAI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAES has higher volatility (29.41%) compared to BBAI (23.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs BBAI's -95.01%.

BBAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAES and BBAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer