LAES vs. QSI
LAES (SEALSQ Corp) and QSI (Quantum-Si incorporated) are both stocks. LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while QSI operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, LAES returned -42.20%/yr vs -15.92%/yr for QSI. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAES vs. QSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly lower than QSI's -16.25% return.
LAES
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -29.86%
- 1Y
- -21.52%
- 3Y*
- -42.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSI
- 1D
- -7.79%
- 1M
- -13.09%
- YTD
- -16.25%
- 6M
- -27.46%
- 1Y
- -46.75%
- 3Y*
- -15.92%
- 5Y*
- -38.59%
- 10Y*
- —
LAES vs. QSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
QSI Quantum-Si incorporated | -16.25% | -59.26% | 34.33% | 16.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAES and QSI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, LAES and QSI have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LAES:
-$0.43
QSI:
-$0.51
LAES:
10.21
QSI:
100.34
LAES:
$35.37M
QSI:
$1.85M
LAES:
$13.21M
QSI:
-$3.71M
LAES:
-$41.81M
QSI:
-$104.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAES vs. QSI — Risk / Return Rank
LAES
QSI
LAES vs. QSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Quantum-Si incorporated (QSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAES | QSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.96 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | -0.64 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | -0.93 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAES vs. QSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, roughly equal to the maximum QSI drawdown of -95.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and QSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAES | QSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -95.33% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.68% | -72.95% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.87% | -83.73% | -14.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -95.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.89% | -93.21% | +7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.60% | -79.32% | -5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.33% | 50.20% | -5.87% |
Volatility
LAES vs. QSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) is 29.41%, while Quantum-Si incorporated (QSI) has a volatility of 31.73%. This indicates that LAES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAES | QSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.41% | 31.73% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.62% | 61.92% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.50% | 94.23% | +15.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.90% | 125.28% | +44.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.90% | 125.24% | +44.66% |
Dividends
LAES vs. QSI - Dividend Comparison
Neither LAES nor QSI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LAES vs. QSI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and Quantum-Si incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LAES and QSI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSI has higher volatility (31.73%) compared to LAES (29.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs QSI's -95.33%.
LAES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAES and QSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer