PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAES vs. APLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAES vs. APLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -37.57% return, which is significantly lower than APLD's 11.70% return.


LAES

1D
0.00%
1M
-22.11%
6M
-42.58%
YTD
-37.57%
1Y
-20.81%
3Y*
-39.84%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-46.97%

APLD

1D
-2.07%
1M
-17.15%
6M
-19.16%
YTD
11.70%
1Y
118.77%
3Y*
43.55%
5Y*
84.53%
10Y*
111.35%
ALL TIME*
26.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$653.03M$590.08M$826.73M
$42.89M$39.39M$52.74M

LAES vs. APLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LAES
SEALSQ Corp
-37.57%-38.54%380.47%-92.82%
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
11.70%220.94%13.35%-15.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LAES and APLD is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023

0.29

Over the past year, LAES and APLD have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAES:

$336.52M

APLD:

$7.83B

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAES:

$35.37M

APLD:

$611.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAES:

$13.21M

APLD:

$214.45M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAES:

-$41.81M

APLD:

-$158.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAES vs. APLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LAES
LAES Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

APLD
APLD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LAES vs. APLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAESAPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.23

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

2.05

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.51

4.56

-5.07

LAES vs. APLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAES Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the APLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAES and APLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAES vs. APLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, roughly equal to the maximum APLD drawdown of -99.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and APLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAESAPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.44%

-99.73%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.68%

-53.23%

-19.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.06%

-71.95%

-25.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.26%

-44.83%

-44.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.70%

-74.51%

-10.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.91%

23.87%

+23.04%

Volatility

LAES vs. APLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) is 15.89%, while Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a volatility of 32.97%. This indicates that LAES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAESAPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.89%

32.97%

-17.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.38%

76.00%

-13.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.30%

109.72%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

167.24%

164.94%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

167.24%

301.14%

-133.90%

Dividends

LAES vs. APLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAES nor APLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LAES vs. APLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and Applied Digital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LAES and APLD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLD has higher volatility (32.97%) compared to LAES (15.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs APLD's -99.73%.

APLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAES and APLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer