MVV vs. XDSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ).
MVV and XDSQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MVV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. XDSQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
MVV vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MVV vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 4.75% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 13.88% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | -4.22% | 14.22% | 23.12% | 23.00% | -16.78% | 12.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's -4.22% return.
MVV
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MVV vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MVV vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
MVV
XDSQ
MVV vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVV | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.81 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.27 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.21 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 5.87 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVV | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.81 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.61 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and XDSQ is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MVV vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.81% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MVV vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and XDSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVV | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -26.06% | -59.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.85% | -12.18% | -14.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.34% | -6.46% | -4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -5.08% | -15.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.97% | 2.50% | +4.47% |
Volatility
MVV vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.68%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MVV | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 5.68% | +7.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.02% | 9.63% | +14.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.30% | 17.99% | +25.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.66% | 15.32% | +24.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.32% | 15.32% | +27.00% |