PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDSQ vs. SNXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDSQ vs. SNXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XDSQ

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.52%
6M
3.33%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*

SNXX

1D
-22.98%
1M
12.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDSQ vs. SNXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDSQ and SNXX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDSQ vs. SNXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SNXX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDSQ vs. SNXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDSQSNXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

XDSQ vs. SNXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDSQSNXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

117.14

-116.45

Drawdowns

XDSQ vs. SNXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum SNXX drawdown of -48.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and SNXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDSQSNXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-48.39%

+22.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-26.72%

+26.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-15.64%

+10.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

XDSQ vs. SNXX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDSQSNXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.55%

198.36%

-187.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

198.36%

-183.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

198.36%

-183.27%

XDSQ vs. SNXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SNXX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDSQ vs. SNXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDSQ nor SNXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDSQ and SNXX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SNXX.

XDSQ and SNXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDSQ and 1.49% for SNXX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDSQ and SNXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer