XDSQ vs. RSSB

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) and RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDSQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while RSSB is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XDSQ returned 15.42% vs 22.19% for RSSB. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XDSQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RSSB.

Performance

XDSQ vs. RSSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDSQ achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than RSSB's 11.24% return.

XDSQ

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 3.39%
• 6M: 4.99%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 1Y: 15.42%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 9.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.86%

RSSB

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: 2.29%
• 6M: 8.12%
• YTD: 11.24%
• 1Y: 22.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	$1.27M	$1.96M	$1.96M
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	$806.75K	$1.08M	$546.28K

XDSQ vs. RSSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	6.35%	14.22%	23.12%	0.94%
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	11.24%	25.16%	10.53%	6.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XDSQ and RSSB is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023	0.77

The correlation between XDSQ and RSSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDSQ vs. RSSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 51
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 49
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDSQ vs. RSSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDSQ	RSSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.35	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.91	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.24	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	1.92	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	7.38	+0.23

XDSQ vs. RSSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDSQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the RSSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDSQ and RSSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDSQ vs. RSSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, which is greater than RSSB's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and RSSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDSQ	RSSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.06%	-16.21%	-9.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.60%	-11.63%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-2.27%	-2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	3.02%	-0.99%

Volatility

XDSQ vs. RSSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) is 3.73%, while Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that XDSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDSQ	RSSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	4.98%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.25%	13.58%	-5.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.96%	16.57%	-5.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.31%	16.78%	-1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.95%	16.78%	-1.83%

XDSQ vs. RSSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDSQ vs. RSSB - Dividend Comparison

XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.13%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDSQ and RSSB in my portfolio?

XDSQ and RSSB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDSQ or RSSB?

RSSB has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to XDSQ (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDSQ dropped -26.06% vs RSSB's -16.21%.

Which ETF is better, XDSQ or RSSB?

On 1-year performance, RSSB leads with 22.19% vs 15.42% for XDSQ. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDSQ or RSSB?

Over the 1-year period, RSSB has performed better with a 22.19% return vs 15.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDSQ or RSSB?

RSSB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDSQ or RSSB?

RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between XDSQ and RSSB?

XDSQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RSSB is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDSQ and 0.39% for RSSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.