MVV vs. UWM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - MVV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%) while UWM tracks the Russell 2000 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVV returned 13.68%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for UWM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

MVV vs. UWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.09% return, which is significantly lower than UWM's 35.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has outperformed UWM with an annualized return of 13.68%, while UWM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.46% annualized return.

MVV

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 6.05%
• YTD: 26.09%
• 6M: 27.71%
• 1Y: 48.71%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

UWM

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 8.25%
• YTD: 35.51%
• 6M: 36.83%
• 1Y: 87.21%
• 3Y*: 26.17%
• 5Y*: 2.44%
• 10Y*: 12.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVV vs. UWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	26.09%	3.48%	17.75%	22.51%	-31.96%	48.57%	6.20%	49.50%	-25.44%	30.81%
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	35.51%	13.59%	11.32%	22.62%	-43.69%	23.91%	16.57%	48.62%	-25.89%	26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and UWM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2007	0.95

The correlation between MVV and UWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MVV vs. UWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVV	UWM
Industrials	25.1%	17.7%
Technology	15.8%	17.0%
Financial Services	14.3%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	8.4%
Healthcare	8.7%	16.5%
Real Estate	7.5%	6.1%
Energy	5.5%	6.1%
Basic Materials	4.8%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	2.4%
Utilities	3.1%	2.9%
Communication Services	1.0%	2.4%

Return for Risk

MVV vs. UWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV

MVV Risk / Return Rank: 47
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 41
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 54

UWM

UWM Risk / Return Rank: 67
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 54
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. UWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MVV	UWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.31	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.88	-0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	3.97	-1.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	13.60	-4.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVV vs. UWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the UWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and UWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MVV	UWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	2.31	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.05	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.27	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.15	+0.11

Drawdowns

MVV vs. UWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum UWM drawdown of -88.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and UWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVV	UWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.54%	-88.21%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.68%	-22.28%	+4.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.80%	-49.79%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.53%	-61.62%	+16.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.19%	-71.46%	+2.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.89%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.55%	-30.89%	+10.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.14%	6.50%	-1.36%

Volatility

MVV vs. UWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 8.69%, while ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVV	UWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	11.10%	-2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.69%	26.79%	-4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.22%	37.92%	-6.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.64%	45.00%	-5.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.37%	46.08%	-3.71%

MVV vs. UWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVV and UWM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

MVV vs. UWM - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than UWM's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	0.67%	0.77%	0.39%	0.77%	0.93%	0.16%	0.29%	0.62%	0.62%	0.21%	0.43%	0.17%
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	0.76%	1.05%	1.16%	0.34%	0.40%	0.00%	0.07%	0.55%	0.41%	0.11%	0.27%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVV and UWM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MVV and UWM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MVV or UWM?

UWM has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to MVV (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs UWM's -88.21%.

Which ETF is better, MVV or UWM?

On 10-year performance, MVV leads with 13.68% vs 12.46% for UWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 8.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVV or UWM?

Over the 10-year period, MVV has performed better with a 13.68% return vs 12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVV or UWM?

MVV and UWM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVV or UWM?

UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.67% for MVV.

What is the main difference between MVV and UWM?

MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.