PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVV vs. OOQB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MVV vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MVV vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -28.65% return.


MVV

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.88%
YTD
4.75%
6M
5.02%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
12.52%

OOQB

1D
-1.69%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-28.65%
6M
-48.97%
1Y
-20.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVV vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MVV vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

OOQB
OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVVOOQBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

-0.35

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

-0.13

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.98

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

-0.33

+1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.51

-0.73

+4.24

MVV vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and OOQB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVVOOQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

-0.35

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.57

+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and OOQB is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MVV vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than OOQB's 13.89% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.81%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%
OOQB
Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF
13.89%9.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MVV vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and OOQB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MVVOOQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.54%

-53.44%

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.68%

-53.44%

+35.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.34%

-50.75%

+39.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-20.16%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

24.40%

-17.40%

Volatility

MVV vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 12.98%, while Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) has a volatility of 16.29%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MVVOOQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.98%

16.29%

-3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.01%

46.00%

-21.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.29%

59.49%

-16.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.64%

61.79%

-22.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.31%

61.79%

-19.48%