PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OOQB vs. HHIS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OOQB vs. HHIS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OOQB vs. HHIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

OOQB is traded in USD, while HHIS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HHIS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOQB achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly lower than HHIS.TO's -15.68% return.


OOQB

1D
5.72%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-28.69%
6M
-45.98%
1Y
-14.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HHIS.TO

1D
1.95%
1M
-6.64%
YTD
-15.68%
6M
-15.45%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OOQB vs. HHIS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOQB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HHIS.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OOQB vs. HHIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB
OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

HHIS.TO
HHIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOQB vs. HHIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OOQBHHIS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.25

0.82

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

1.42

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.19

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

1.12

-1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.66

3.24

-3.90

OOQB vs. HHIS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOQB Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOQB and HHIS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OOQBHHIS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

0.82

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.57

0.23

-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between OOQB and HHIS.TO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OOQB vs. HHIS.TO - Dividend Comparison

OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%, less than HHIS.TO's 28.51% yield.


Drawdowns

OOQB vs. HHIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOQB drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, which is greater than HHIS.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOQB and HHIS.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OOQBHHIS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.44%

-31.83%

-21.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.44%

-24.43%

-29.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.78%

-23.04%

-27.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.94%

-8.76%

-11.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.98%

9.10%

+14.88%

Volatility

OOQB vs. HHIS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) at 8.41%. This indicates that OOQB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HHIS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OOQBHHIS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.69%

8.41%

+10.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.05%

19.21%

+26.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.59%

32.82%

+26.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.96%

36.21%

+25.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.96%

36.21%

+25.75%