OOQB vs. NFLU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU).

OOQB and NFLU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OOQB is an actively managed fund by Volatility Shares. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. NFLU is an actively managed fund by REX Shares. It was launched on Sep 26, 2024.

Performance

OOQB vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OOQB vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-28.69%	-13.30%
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-1.14%	-34.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOQB achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly lower than NFLU's -1.14% return.

OOQB

• 1D: 5.72%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: -28.69%
• 6M: -45.98%
• 1Y: -14.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFLU

• 1D: 7.04%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: -1.14%
• 6M: -43.54%
• 1Y: -15.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OOQB vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOQB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.

NFLU

T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF

OOQB

Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF

Return for Risk

OOQB vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 8
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 10
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 6

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 9
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOQB vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OOQB	NFLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	-0.23	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	0.13	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.02	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	-0.22	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	-0.41	-0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OOQB vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOQB Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is comparable to the NFLU Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOQB and NFLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OOQB	NFLU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	-0.23	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.57	0.28	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between OOQB and NFLU is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

OOQB vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%, while NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	13.89%	9.53%
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OOQB vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOQB drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOQB and NFLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	OOQB	NFLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.44%	-72.10%	+18.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.44%	-72.10%	+18.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.78%	-56.84%	+6.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.94%	-24.06%	+4.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.98%	38.59%	-14.61%

Volatility

OOQB vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) at 14.93%. This indicates that OOQB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OOQB	NFLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.69%	14.93%	+3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.05%	53.07%	-7.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.59%	68.25%	-8.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.96%	69.30%	-7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.96%	69.30%	-7.34%