OOQB vs. QQQM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).

OOQB and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OOQB is an actively managed fund by Volatility Shares. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020.

Performance

OOQB vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OOQB vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-28.69%	-13.30%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	-5.92%	14.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOQB achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's -5.92% return.

OOQB

• 1D: 5.72%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: -28.69%
• 6M: -45.98%
• 1Y: -14.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: 3.37%
• 1M: -4.84%
• YTD: -5.92%
• 6M: -3.59%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 22.41%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OOQB vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOQB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

OOQB

Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF

QQQM

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Return for Risk

OOQB vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 8
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 10
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 70
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOQB vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OOQB	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	1.06	-1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	1.65	-1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.24	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	1.89	-2.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	6.96	-7.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OOQB vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOQB Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOQB and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OOQB	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	1.06	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.57	0.63	-1.19

Correlation

The correlation between OOQB and QQQM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

OOQB vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	13.89%	9.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.53%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Drawdowns

OOQB vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOQB drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOQB and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	OOQB	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.44%	-35.04%	-18.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.44%	-12.55%	-40.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.78%	-8.99%	-41.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.94%	-8.47%	-11.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.98%	3.41%	+20.57%

Volatility

OOQB vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.48%. This indicates that OOQB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OOQB	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.69%	6.48%	+12.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.05%	12.73%	+33.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.59%	22.42%	+37.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.96%	22.25%	+39.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.96%	22.27%	+39.69%