MVFG vs. GXTG

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

MVFG (Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MVFG tracks the Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index while GXTG tracks the Solactive Thematic Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVFG returned 25.81% vs -10.20% for GXTG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVFG charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.

Performance

MVFG vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVFG achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than GXTG's -3.81% return.

MVFG

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 3.91%
• YTD: 12.63%
• 1Y: 25.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXTG

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -17.37%
• 6M: -8.90%
• YTD: -3.81%
• 1Y: -10.20%
• 3Y*: -6.09%
• 5Y*: -12.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVFG vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MVFG Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF	12.63%	20.98%	5.38%
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	-3.81%	3.52%	-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MVFG and GXTG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.68

The correlation between MVFG and GXTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MVFG vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVFG

MVFG Risk / Return Rank: 50
MVFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
MVFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MVFG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MVFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MVFG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

GXTG

GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 6
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVFG vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVFG	GXTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	-0.34	+1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	-0.28	+2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.96	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	-0.41	+2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.69	-0.88	+7.57

MVFG vs. GXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the GXTG Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVFG and GXTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVFG vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVFG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFG and GXTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVFG	GXTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.34%	-67.81%	+52.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	-24.98%	+9.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-61.98%	+60.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-43.31%	+40.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	11.62%	-7.76%

Volatility

MVFG vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) is 3.06%, while Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that MVFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVFG	GXTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	10.34%	-7.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.73%	23.82%	-13.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.11%	29.78%	-10.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.29%	28.44%	-13.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.29%	29.95%	-14.66%

MVFG vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVFG has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVFG vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison

MVFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than GXTG's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.56%	1.40%	1.08%	1.99%	1.48%	1.56%	0.48%	0.31%
MVFG Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF	1.53%	1.90%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVFG and GXTG in my portfolio?

MVFG and GXTG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVFG or GXTG?

GXTG has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to MVFG (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVFG dropped -15.34% vs GXTG's -67.81%.

Which ETF is better, MVFG or GXTG?

On 1-year performance, MVFG leads with 25.81% vs -10.20% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MVFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVFG or GXTG?

Over the 1-year period, MVFG has performed better with a 25.81% return vs -10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVFG or GXTG?

GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for MVFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVFG or GXTG?

GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.53% for MVFG.

What is the main difference between MVFG and GXTG?

MVFG tracks Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index, while GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.42% for MVFG and 0.50% for GXTG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.