MVFG vs. SPGM
MVFG (Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MVFG tracks the Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index while SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVFG returned 28.24% vs 31.70% for SPGM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MVFG charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.
Performance
MVFG vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVFG achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 12.88% return.
MVFG
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 13.45%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
MVFG vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MVFG Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF | 12.12% | 20.98% | 5.33% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 12.88% | 23.62% | 9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVFG and SPGM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between MVFG and SPGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVFG vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
MVFG
SPGM
MVFG vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVFG | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.35 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 15.14 | -7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVFG | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.47 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.66 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
MVFG vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVFG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum SPGM drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFG and SPGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVFG | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -33.97% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.34% | -9.50% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.87% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -4.81% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 2.10% | +1.74% |
Volatility
MVFG vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVFG | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 3.92% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 10.35% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.75% | 12.88% | +5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 16.03% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 17.57% | -2.18% |
MVFG vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVFG has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVFG vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
MVFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than SPGM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVFG Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF | 1.92% | 1.90% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVFG and SPGM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPGM has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to MVFG (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVFG dropped -15.34% vs SPGM's -33.97%.
On 1-year performance, SPGM leads with 31.70% vs 28.24% for MVFG. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MVFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 31.70% return vs 28.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for MVFG.
MVFG has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.79% for SPGM.
MVFG tracks Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.42% for MVFG and 0.09% for SPGM.
SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVFG and SPGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer