PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVFG vs. UFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVFG vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVFG achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 58.40% return.


MVFG

1D
0.52%
1M
3.11%
YTD
13.00%
6M
16.25%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UFO

1D
0.23%
1M
19.20%
YTD
58.40%
6M
86.32%
1Y
152.46%
3Y*
48.89%
5Y*
17.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVFG vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MVFG
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF
13.00%20.98%5.33%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
58.40%67.36%39.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MVFG and UFO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

0.58

The correlation between MVFG and UFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVFG vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVFG
MVFG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MVFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVFG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MVFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVFG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

UFO
UFO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVFG vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVFGUFODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

4.08

-2.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

4.36

-2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

6.94

-4.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.86

22.87

-15.00

MVFG vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the UFO Sharpe Ratio of 4.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVFG and UFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVFGUFODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

4.08

-2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.49

+0.67

Drawdowns

MVFG vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVFG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFG and UFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVFGUFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-50.33%

+34.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-21.95%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.71%

+9.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-21.82%

+19.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

6.66%

-2.82%

Volatility

MVFG vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) is 3.79%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 15.24%. This indicates that MVFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVFGUFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

15.24%

-11.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

30.78%

-19.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

37.59%

-18.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

29.80%

-14.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

30.69%

-15.30%

MVFG vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVFG has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVFG vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

MVFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than UFO's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MVFG
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF
1.91%1.90%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
0.27%0.46%1.98%1.90%3.19%1.00%1.07%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVFG and UFO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UFO has higher volatility (15.24%) compared to MVFG (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVFG dropped -15.34% vs UFO's -50.33%.

On 1-year performance, UFO leads with 152.46% vs 28.96% for MVFG. On fees, UFO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MVFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UFO has performed better with a 152.46% return vs 28.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UFO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for MVFG.

MVFG has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.27% for UFO.

MVFG tracks Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 1.42% for MVFG and 0.75% for UFO.

UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVFG and UFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer