PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUST vs. RECS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MUST vs. RECS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MUST vs. RECS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
0.02%4.92%0.37%6.23%-8.82%1.93%6.67%8.35%2.72%
RECS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
-4.55%19.30%26.27%23.19%-14.39%32.73%15.35%-0.93%0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUST achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than RECS's -4.55% return.


MUST

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
0.02%
6M
1.52%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*

RECS

1D
2.71%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
-4.55%
6M
-2.31%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
8.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MUST vs. RECS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than RECS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MUST vs. RECS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUST
MUST Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUST Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUST Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

RECS
RECS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RECS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RECS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RECS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RECS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RECS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUST vs. RECS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSTRECSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.03

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

1.56

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.56

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.26

7.20

-2.94

MUST vs. RECS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUST Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the RECS Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUST and RECS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUSTRECSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.03

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.79

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.34

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between MUST and RECS is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MUST vs. RECS - Dividend Comparison

MUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than RECS's 1.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
3.29%3.28%3.13%2.51%1.76%1.62%2.33%2.70%0.55%
RECS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
1.16%1.11%1.09%1.00%1.41%20.64%1.09%0.49%0.00%

Drawdowns

MUST vs. RECS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUST drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, smaller than the maximum RECS drawdown of -34.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUST and RECS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSTRECSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-34.29%

+20.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.56%

-12.45%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.83%

-22.08%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-6.34%

+3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-1.29%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.70%

-1.45%

Volatility

MUST vs. RECS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) is 1.84%, while Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that MUST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RECS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MUSTRECSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

5.03%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

9.27%

-5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

18.20%

-11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

16.40%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.60%

16.14%

-10.54%