PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MUST vs. EVIM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MUST and EVIM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MUST vs. EVIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.82%
-0.25%
MUST
EVIM

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MUST:

5.46%

EVIM:

4.23%

Max Drawdown

MUST:

-13.83%

EVIM:

-2.75%

Current Drawdown

MUST:

-3.36%

EVIM:

-1.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUST achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than EVIM's 0.20% return.


MUST

YTD

0.05%

1M

0.05%

6M

-0.83%

1Y

0.76%

5Y*

0.71%

10Y*

N/A

EVIM

YTD

0.20%

1M

0.20%

6M

-0.25%

1Y

2.43%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MUST vs. EVIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EVIM's 0.29% expense ratio.


EVIM
Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for EVIM: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%
Expense ratio chart for MUST: current value at 0.23% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.23%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MUST vs. EVIM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUST is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUST is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUST is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUST is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUST is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUST is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

EVIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EVIM is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EVIM is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EVIM is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EVIM is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EVIM is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EVIM is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MUST vs. EVIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MUST, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.310.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for MUST, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.480.89
The chart of Omega ratio for MUST, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.061.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for MUST, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.520.89
The chart of Martin ratio for MUST, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.412.54
MUST
EVIM


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26
0.31
0.63
MUST
EVIM

Dividends

MUST vs. EVIM - Dividend Comparison

MUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than EVIM's 3.53% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
2.87%3.13%2.51%1.76%1.61%2.34%2.69%0.55%
EVIM
Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF
3.53%3.89%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MUST vs. EVIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUST drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, which is greater than EVIM's maximum drawdown of -2.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUST and EVIM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-3.50%-3.00%-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.10%
-1.67%
MUST
EVIM

Volatility

MUST vs. EVIM - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) at 1.18%. This indicates that MUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.79%
1.18%
MUST
EVIM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab