MUST vs. SCMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB).
MUST and SCMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MUST is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Multi-Sector Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2018. SCMB is a passively managed fund by Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022. Both MUST and SCMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MUST or SCMB.
Correlation
The correlation between MUST and SCMB is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MUST vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MUST:
0.31
SCMB:
0.78
MUST:
0.48
SCMB:
1.08
MUST:
1.06
SCMB:
1.14
MUST:
0.29
SCMB:
1.21
MUST:
1.41
SCMB:
2.92
MUST:
1.21%
SCMB:
1.07%
MUST:
5.46%
SCMB:
4.01%
MUST:
-13.83%
SCMB:
-5.07%
MUST:
-3.36%
SCMB:
-1.44%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUST achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than SCMB's 0.16% return.
MUST
0.05%
0.05%
-0.83%
0.76%
0.71%
N/A
SCMB
0.16%
0.16%
0.49%
2.29%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUST vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MUST vs. SCMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MUST
SCMB
MUST vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MUST vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
MUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than SCMB's 3.89% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 2.87% | 3.13% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 2.69% | 0.55% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.89% | 4.46% | 5.42% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MUST vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUST drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUST and SCMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MUST vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 1.22%. This indicates that MUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.