MUST vs. SCMB
MUST (Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUST is a Money Market fund tracking the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Multi-Sector Municipal Bond Index, while SCMB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MUST returned 3.55%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for SCMB. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUST charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.
Performance
MUST vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUST achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.54% return.
MUST
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 6.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUST vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 2.04% | 4.92% | 0.37% | 6.23% | 3.09% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 1.54% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUST and SCMB is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between MUST and SCMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUST vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
MUST
SCMB
MUST vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUST | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.27 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | 7.44 | -1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUST vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUST drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUST and SCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUST | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -6.13% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | -2.92% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.08% | -5.57% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.40% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -1.31% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 0.89% | +0.23% |
Volatility
MUST vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 0.72%. This indicates that MUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUST | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 0.72% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.61% | 2.16% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.03% | 2.89% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 4.14% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 4.14% | +1.44% |
MUST vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MUST vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
MUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than SCMB's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 3.31% | 3.28% | 3.13% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.62% | 2.33% | 2.70% | 0.55% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.52% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUST and SCMB have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUST has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to SCMB (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUST dropped -13.83% vs SCMB's -6.13%.
On 3-year performance, MUST leads with 3.55% vs 3.19% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MUST has performed better with a 3.55% return vs 3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MUST.
SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 3.31% for MUST.
MUST is categorized as Money Market, while SCMB is Municipal Bonds. MUST tracks Bloomberg Beta Advantage Multi-Sector Municipal Bond Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MUST and 0.03% for SCMB.
SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUST and SCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer