PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUSA vs. HES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MUSA vs. HES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Hess Corporation (HES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MUSA

1D
0.07%
1M
8.16%
YTD
54.70%
6M
53.60%
1Y
55.66%
3Y*
29.75%
5Y*
35.86%
10Y*
24.92%

HES

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSA vs. HES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
54.70%-19.15%41.27%28.20%41.02%53.33%12.06%52.66%-4.63%30.73%
HES
Hess Corporation
0.00%12.77%-6.49%2.90%94.02%42.08%-19.14%67.71%-13.14%-22.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSA and HES is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2013

0.19

The correlation between MUSA and HES shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

MUSA:

$19.68B

HES:

$12.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MUSA:

$487.10M

HES:

$7.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

MUSA:

$1.06B

HES:

$6.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUSA vs. HES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSA
MUSA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSA vs. HES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Hess Corporation (HES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUSAHESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

MUSA vs. HES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUSA vs. HES - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSAHESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.58%

Volatility

MUSA vs. HES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSAHESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.33%

Dividends

MUSA vs. HES - Dividend Comparison

MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while HES has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HES
Hess Corporation
0.34%0.67%1.41%1.21%1.06%1.35%1.89%1.50%2.47%2.11%1.61%2.06%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
0.39%0.53%0.36%0.43%0.45%0.52%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MUSA vs. HES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy USA Inc. and Hess Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
4.82B
2.94B
(MUSA) Total Revenue
(HES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MUSA and HES have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUSA and HES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer