PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HES vs. EQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HES vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hess Corporation (HES) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HES

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EQT

1D
0.51%
1M
1.81%
6M
-1.62%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
25.80%
10Y*
4.39%
ALL TIME*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$418.95M$392.36M$389.11M

HES vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HES
Hess Corporation
0.00%12.77%-6.49%2.90%94.02%42.08%-19.14%67.71%-13.14%-22.06%
EQT
EQT Corporation
0.49%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HES and EQT is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.43

The correlation between HES and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

HES:

$12.47B

EQT:

$9.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HES:

$7.43B

EQT:

$6.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

HES:

$6.60B

EQT:

$6.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HES vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HES vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hess Corporation (HES) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HESEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

HES vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HES vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HESEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.70%

Volatility

HES vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HESEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.97%

Dividends

HES vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

HES has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.22%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%
HES
Hess Corporation
0.00%0.67%1.41%1.21%1.06%1.35%1.89%1.50%2.47%2.11%1.61%2.06%

Financials

HES vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hess Corporation and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HES and EQT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HES and EQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer