MUSA vs. BALT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT).

BALT is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021.

Performance

MUSA vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MUSA vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	22.82%	-19.15%	41.27%	28.20%	41.02%	49.47%
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF	-0.00%	6.65%	9.98%	7.45%	2.54%	0.82%

Returns By Period

MUSA

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 22.76%
• YTD: 22.82%
• 6M: 25.82%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 28.42%
• 10Y*: 23.45%

BALT

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: -0.00%
• 6M: 2.06%
• 1Y: 6.74%
• 3Y*: 7.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MUSA vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSA

MUSA Risk / Return Rank: 42
MUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BALT

BALT Risk / Return Rank: 84
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSA vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUSA	BALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	1.51	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	2.32	-1.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.43	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	1.95	-1.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	12.95	-12.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUSA vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSA and BALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUSA	BALT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	1.51	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.71	-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between MUSA and BALT is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MUSA vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	0.46%	0.53%	0.36%	0.43%	0.45%	0.52%	0.19%
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MUSA vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and BALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSA	BALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.54%	-4.89%	-30.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.25%	-3.48%	-27.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.30%	-0.92%	-9.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.02%	-0.35%	-9.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.30%	0.52%	+20.78%

Volatility

MUSA vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.62%. This indicates that MUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSA	BALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.94%	0.62%	+8.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.71%	1.84%	+23.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.58%	4.48%	+32.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.10%	3.36%	+25.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.89%	3.36%	+27.53%