PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MUSA vs. BAH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MUSABAH
YTD Return44.95%22.06%
1Y Return53.23%40.55%
3Y Return (Ann)46.54%26.78%
5Y Return (Ann)43.60%19.13%
10Y Return (Ann)25.50%22.61%
Sharpe Ratio2.211.55
Daily Std Dev23.40%25.98%
Max Drawdown-33.72%-32.40%
Current Drawdown-3.83%-3.27%

Fundamentals


MUSABAH
Market Cap$10.56B$19.96B
EPS$24.68$4.63
PE Ratio20.8833.37
PEG Ratio2.292.29
Total Revenue (TTM)$21.16B$10.95B
Gross Profit (TTM)$10.79B$4.04B
EBITDA (TTM)$928.50M$1.03B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between MUSA and BAH is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MUSA vs. BAH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than BAH's 22.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has outperformed BAH with an annualized return of 25.50%, while BAH has yielded a comparatively lower 22.61% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
24.68%
5.95%
MUSA
BAH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MUSA vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 3.27, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.27
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 6.41, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 17.32, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0017.32
BAH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAH, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAH, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAH, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAH, currently valued at 3.00, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.003.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAH, currently valued at 10.61, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0010.61

MUSA vs. BAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the BAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MUSA and BAH.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.21
1.55
MUSA
BAH

Dividends

MUSA vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison

MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BAH's 1.29% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
0.33%0.43%0.45%0.52%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
1.29%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%9.14%7.26%

Drawdowns

MUSA vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, roughly equal to the maximum BAH drawdown of -32.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and BAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-3.83%
-3.27%
MUSA
BAH

Volatility

MUSA vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison

Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) at 5.50%. This indicates that MUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
6.13%
5.50%
MUSA
BAH

Financials

MUSA vs. BAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy USA Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items