MUSA vs. FICO

In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 47.82% return, which is significantly lower than FICO's 98.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has underperformed FICO with an annualized return of 23.97%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively higher 41.59% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the FICO Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSA and FICO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum FICO drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and FICO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is 6.73%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that MUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy USA Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.