MUSA vs. FICO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO).

Performance

MUSA vs. FICO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MUSA vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	22.82%	-19.15%	41.27%	28.20%	41.02%	53.33%	12.06%	52.66%	-4.63%	30.73%
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation	-37.18%	-15.08%	71.04%	94.46%	38.03%	-15.14%	36.39%	100.36%	22.06%	28.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MUSA : $9.32B FICO : $25.44B
EPS MUSA : $24.32 FICO : $27.15
PE Ratio MUSA : 20.35 FICO : 39.12
PEG Ratio MUSA : 1.10 FICO : 2.08
PS Ratio MUSA : 0.49 FICO : 12.47
Total Revenue (TTM) MUSA : $19.38B FICO : $2.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) MUSA : $1.09B FICO : $1.71B
EBITDA (TTM) MUSA : $940.50M FICO : $1.00B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 22.82% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -37.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has underperformed FICO with an annualized return of 23.45%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively higher 25.60% annualized return.

MUSA

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 22.76%
• YTD: 22.82%
• 6M: 25.82%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 28.42%
• 10Y*: 23.45%

FICO

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -24.55%
• YTD: -37.18%
• 6M: -29.80%
• 1Y: -43.16%
• 3Y*: 14.76%
• 5Y*: 16.22%
• 10Y*: 25.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MUSA vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSA

MUSA Risk / Return Rank: 42
MUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FICO

FICO Risk / Return Rank: 10
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSA vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUSA	FICO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	-0.83	+0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	-1.06	+1.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.85	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	-0.77	+0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	-1.49	+1.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUSA vs. FICO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the FICO Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSA and FICO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUSA	FICO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	-0.83	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	0.41	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.69	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.48	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between MUSA and FICO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MUSA vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison

MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	0.46%	0.53%	0.36%	0.43%	0.45%	0.52%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.07%	0.08%

Drawdowns

MUSA vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, smaller than the maximum FICO drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and FICO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSA	FICO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.54%	-79.26%	+43.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.25%	-54.90%	+23.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.54%	-58.24%	+22.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.54%	-58.24%	+22.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.30%	-55.42%	+45.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.02%	-17.83%	+7.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.30%	28.50%	-7.20%

Volatility

MUSA vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is 8.94%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 21.65%. This indicates that MUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSA	FICO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.94%	21.65%	-12.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.71%	38.52%	-12.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.58%	52.35%	-15.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.10%	39.47%	-10.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.89%	37.39%	-6.50%

Financials

MUSA vs. FICO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Murphy USA Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MUSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FICO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 424.70M and revenue of 511.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.0%.

MUSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 209.50M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

FICO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 234.05M and revenue of 511.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.7%.

MUSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 141.90M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

FICO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 158.37M and revenue of 511.96M, resulting in a net margin of 30.9%.