MUSA vs. FICO
Compare and contrast key facts about Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MUSA or FICO.
Key characteristics
| MUSA | FICO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 48.31% | 61.89% |
| 1Y Return | 55.35% | 108.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 47.74% | 63.43% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 44.32% | 42.64% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 25.79% | 41.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.51 | 3.61 |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.35% | 30.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.72% | -79.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.60% | -0.56% |
Fundamentals
| MUSA | FICO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.80B | $46.46B |
| EPS | $24.68 | $19.03 |
| PE Ratio | 21.36 | 99.03 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.38 | 1.81 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $21.16B | $1.65B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $10.79B | $1.31B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $928.50M | $718.55M |
Correlation
The correlation between MUSA and FICO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MUSA vs. FICO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 48.31% return, which is significantly lower than FICO's 61.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has underperformed FICO with an annualized return of 25.79%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively higher 41.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MUSA vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MUSA vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison
MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
MUSA vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum FICO drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and FICO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MUSA vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is 5.76%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that MUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MUSA vs. FICO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy USA Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities