PortfoliosLab logo
HES vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HES and FANG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HES vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hess Corporation (HES) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HES:

-0.51

FANG:

-0.73

Sortino Ratio

HES:

-0.60

FANG:

-0.86

Omega Ratio

HES:

0.91

FANG:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

HES:

-0.71

FANG:

-0.69

Martin Ratio

HES:

-1.51

FANG:

-1.48

Ulcer Index

HES:

10.93%

FANG:

19.49%

Daily Std Dev

HES:

28.85%

FANG:

39.19%

Max Drawdown

HES:

-74.83%

FANG:

-88.72%

Current Drawdown

HES:

-20.06%

FANG:

-33.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HES:

$40.84B

FANG:

$40.42B

EPS

HES:

$7.21

FANG:

$16.08

PE Ratio

HES:

18.31

FANG:

8.60

PEG Ratio

HES:

3.32

FANG:

1.20

PS Ratio

HES:

3.33

FANG:

3.29

PB Ratio

HES:

3.56

FANG:

1.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

HES:

$12.47B

FANG:

$12.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HES:

$7.43B

FANG:

$6.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

HES:

$6.60B

FANG:

$8.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HES achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's -15.63% return. Over the past 10 years, HES has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 8.34%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.88% annualized return.


HES

YTD

-1.81%

1M

3.04%

6M

-11.12%

1Y

-14.64%

3Y*

6.05%

5Y*

24.28%

10Y*

8.34%

FANG

YTD

-15.63%

1M

3.71%

6M

-23.83%

1Y

-28.48%

3Y*

6.66%

5Y*

31.59%

10Y*

7.88%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Hess Corporation

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HES vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HES is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HES is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HES is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HES is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HES is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HES is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HES vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hess Corporation (HES) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HES Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is higher than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HES and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HES vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

HES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than FANG's 3.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HES
Hess Corporation
1.49%1.41%1.22%1.06%1.35%1.89%1.50%2.47%2.11%1.61%2.06%1.35%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
3.84%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HES vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HES drawdown since its inception was -74.83%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HES and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HES vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hess Corporation (HES) is 6.25%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that HES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HES vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hess Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.94B
4.03B
(HES) Total Revenue
(FANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HES vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hess Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
41.5%
45.0%
(HES) Gross Margin
(FANG) Gross Margin
HES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hess Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.5%.

FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.81B and revenue of 4.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

HES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hess Corporation reported an operating income of 781.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 4.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

HES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hess Corporation reported a net income of 430.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.03B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.