PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HES vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HESFANG
YTD Return1.62%22.87%
1Y Return1.93%22.31%
3Y Return (Ann)22.40%24.59%
5Y Return (Ann)18.15%24.17%
10Y Return (Ann)7.77%13.69%
Sharpe Ratio0.100.82
Sortino Ratio0.281.27
Omega Ratio1.041.17
Calmar Ratio0.101.16
Martin Ratio0.223.09
Ulcer Index10.01%7.22%
Daily Std Dev23.21%27.32%
Max Drawdown-74.83%-88.72%
Current Drawdown-11.52%-12.04%

Fundamentals


HESFANG
Market Cap$43.38B$52.53B
EPS$8.58$17.33
PE Ratio16.4110.38
PEG Ratio0.771.20
Total Revenue (TTM)$12.80B$9.57B
Gross Profit (TTM)$9.31B$6.02B
EBITDA (TTM)$6.70B$6.51B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between HES and FANG is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

HES vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HES achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 22.87% return. Over the past 10 years, HES has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 7.77%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.55%
-4.65%
HES
FANG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HES vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hess Corporation (HES) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HES
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HES, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.10
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HES, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HES, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HES, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HES, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.22
FANG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FANG, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.27
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FANG, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.09

HES vs. FANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HES Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HES and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.10
0.82
HES
FANG

Dividends

HES vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

HES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FANG's 4.54% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HES
Hess Corporation
1.25%1.22%1.06%1.35%1.89%1.50%2.47%2.11%1.61%2.06%1.35%0.84%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.54%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HES vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HES drawdown since its inception was -74.83%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HES and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.52%
-12.04%
HES
FANG

Volatility

HES vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hess Corporation (HES) is 5.05%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that HES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.05%
7.85%
HES
FANG

Financials

HES vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hess Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items