HES vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Hess Corporation (HES) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HES or FANG.
Correlation
The correlation between HES and FANG is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HES vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HES:
-0.44
FANG:
0.17
HES:
-0.44
FANG:
0.43
HES:
0.94
FANG:
1.05
HES:
-0.42
FANG:
0.19
HES:
-0.93
FANG:
0.53
HES:
10.54%
FANG:
8.92%
HES:
22.42%
FANG:
28.13%
HES:
-74.83%
FANG:
-88.72%
HES:
-20.60%
FANG:
-24.74%
Fundamentals
HES:
$41.41B
FANG:
$46.76B
HES:
$8.59
FANG:
$17.33
HES:
15.65
FANG:
9.24
HES:
0.72
FANG:
1.20
HES:
$12.71B
FANG:
$9.57B
HES:
$6.55B
FANG:
$6.02B
HES:
$6.93B
FANG:
$6.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HES achieves a -8.81% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 5.13% return. Over the past 10 years, HES has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 7.50%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
HES
-8.81%
-11.37%
-8.82%
-10.62%
16.66%
7.50%
FANG
5.13%
-14.19%
-15.95%
3.74%
17.21%
12.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HES vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hess Corporation (HES) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HES vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
HES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than FANG's 5.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HES Hess Corporation | 1.45% | 1.22% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.89% | 1.50% | 2.47% | 2.11% | 1.61% | 2.06% | 1.35% | 0.84% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 5.31% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HES vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HES drawdown since its inception was -74.83%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HES and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HES vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hess Corporation (HES) is 5.94%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that HES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HES vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hess Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities