HES vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Hess Corporation (HES) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HES or FANG.
Correlation
The correlation between HES and FANG is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HES vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HES:
0.29
FANG:
0.78
HES:
0.51
FANG:
1.21
HES:
1.07
FANG:
1.16
HES:
0.28
FANG:
0.84
HES:
0.57
FANG:
2.13
HES:
11.24%
FANG:
10.27%
HES:
22.39%
FANG:
28.22%
HES:
-74.83%
FANG:
-88.72%
HES:
-8.84%
FANG:
-13.42%
Fundamentals
HES:
$45.88B
FANG:
$52.43B
HES:
$8.58
FANG:
$17.51
HES:
17.36
FANG:
10.25
HES:
0.80
FANG:
1.20
HES:
$9.70B
FANG:
$7.36B
HES:
$5.61B
FANG:
$4.77B
HES:
$5.57B
FANG:
$4.93B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HES achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's 9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, HES has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.19% annualized return.
HES
11.96%
9.61%
-2.83%
9.14%
18.15%
9.68%
FANG
9.60%
12.98%
-13.42%
24.08%
20.16%
13.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HES vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HES
FANG
HES vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hess Corporation (HES) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HES vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
HES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than FANG's 4.62% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hess Corporation | 1.26% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.89% | 1.50% | 2.47% | 2.11% | 1.61% | 2.06% | 1.35% |
Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 4.62% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HES vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HES drawdown since its inception was -74.83%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HES and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HES vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Hess Corporation (HES) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) have volatilities of 6.99% and 6.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HES vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hess Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities