MUSA vs. WSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MUSA or WSM.
Key characteristics
| MUSA | WSM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 44.95% | 48.05% |
| 1Y Return | 53.23% | 109.68% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 46.54% | 19.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 43.60% | 38.43% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 25.50% | 18.68% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.21 | 2.42 |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.40% | 44.61% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.72% | -89.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.83% | -9.12% |
Fundamentals
| MUSA | WSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.56B | $18.64B |
| EPS | $24.68 | $8.32 |
| PE Ratio | 20.88 | 17.73 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.29 | 2.07 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $21.16B | $7.58B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $10.79B | $3.50B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $928.50M | $1.62B |
Correlation
The correlation between MUSA and WSM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MUSA vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 48.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has outperformed WSM with an annualized return of 25.50%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively lower 18.68% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MUSA vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MUSA vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than WSM's 1.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
MUSA vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and WSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MUSA vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is 6.13%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 16.11%. This indicates that MUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MUSA vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy USA Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities