MUSA vs. WSM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MUSA (Murphy USA Inc.) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, MUSA returned 22.80%/yr vs 25.50%/yr for WSM. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MUSA vs. WSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 30.75% return, which is significantly higher than WSM's 14.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 22.80%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.50% annualized return.

MUSA

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -11.76%
• YTD: 30.75%
• 6M: 36.15%
• 1Y: 24.51%
• 3Y*: 22.65%
• 5Y*: 31.89%
• 10Y*: 22.80%

WSM

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 13.25%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 15.30%
• 1Y: 30.72%
• 3Y*: 53.52%
• 5Y*: 22.24%
• 10Y*: 25.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSA vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	30.75%	-19.15%	41.27%	28.20%	41.02%	53.33%	12.06%	52.66%	-4.63%	30.73%
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc.	14.95%	-2.09%	86.56%	80.24%	-30.49%	68.60%	42.38%	50.07%	0.61%	10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSA and WSM is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013	0.26

The correlation between MUSA and WSM shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MUSA : $9.84B WSM : $24.44B
EPS MUSA : $28.85 WSM : $8.93
PE Ratio MUSA : 18.23 WSM : 22.83
PEG Ratio MUSA : 0.99 WSM : 4.62
PS Ratio MUSA : 0.51 WSM : 3.15
PB Ratio MUSA : 14.94 WSM : 13.07
Total Revenue (TTM) MUSA : $19.68B WSM : $7.88B
Gross Profit (TTM) MUSA : $487.10M WSM : $3.63B
EBITDA (TTM) MUSA : $1.06B WSM : $1.49B

Return for Risk

MUSA vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSA

MUSA Risk / Return Rank: 60
MUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
MUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
MUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

WSM

WSM Risk / Return Rank: 64
WSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
WSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
WSM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WSM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSA vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUSA	WSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	0.92	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	1.52	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.17	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	1.20	+0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.52	2.72	-0.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUSA vs. WSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the WSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSA and WSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUSA	WSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	0.92	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	0.50	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.58	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.34	+0.42

Drawdowns

MUSA vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and WSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSA	WSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.54%	-89.01%	+53.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.72%	-23.27%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.54%	-36.79%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.54%	-51.92%	+16.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.54%	-59.71%	+24.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.87%	-7.26%	-5.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.98%	-25.05%	+15.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.53%	10.22%	-0.69%

Volatility

MUSA vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is 8.54%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that MUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSA	WSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.54%	11.59%	-3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.69%	24.54%	+4.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.98%	33.73%	+4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.10%	44.71%	-14.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.18%	44.23%	-13.05%

Dividends

MUSA vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison

MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than WSM's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	0.46%	0.53%	0.36%	0.43%	0.45%	0.52%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc.	1.34%	1.43%	1.16%	1.72%	2.65%	1.43%	1.93%	2.55%	3.33%	2.98%	3.02%	2.36%

Financials

MUSA vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Murphy USA Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MUSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

MUSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 205.20M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

WSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

MUSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 136.30M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

WSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUSA and WSM in my portfolio?

MUSA and WSM have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUSA or WSM?

WSM has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to MUSA (8.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSA dropped -35.54% vs WSM's -89.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.