MUSA vs. WSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MUSA or WSM.
Correlation
The correlation between MUSA and WSM is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MUSA vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MUSA:
1.86
WSM:
1.61
MUSA:
2.74
WSM:
2.50
MUSA:
1.33
WSM:
1.34
MUSA:
3.83
WSM:
3.96
MUSA:
10.49
WSM:
8.76
MUSA:
4.36%
WSM:
9.43%
MUSA:
24.65%
WSM:
51.27%
MUSA:
-33.72%
WSM:
-89.01%
MUSA:
-5.36%
WSM:
-8.68%
Fundamentals
MUSA:
$10.93B
WSM:
$24.40B
MUSA:
$24.20
WSM:
$8.46
MUSA:
22.30
WSM:
23.43
MUSA:
2.40
WSM:
2.48
MUSA:
$20.60B
WSM:
$7.53B
MUSA:
$5.88B
WSM:
$3.52B
MUSA:
$1.00B
WSM:
$1.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 48.01% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 82.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has outperformed WSM with an annualized return of 23.63%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.98% annualized return.
MUSA
48.01%
0.27%
9.50%
48.67%
35.03%
23.63%
WSM
82.35%
31.89%
20.04%
82.62%
40.86%
19.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MUSA vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MUSA vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than WSM's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.34% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.19% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
MUSA vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and WSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MUSA vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is 6.19%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that MUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MUSA vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy USA Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities