MTYY vs. PLTM
MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MTYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). MTYY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.
Performance
MTYY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -33.22% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -15.61% return.
MTYY
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -26.74%
- YTD
- -33.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTM
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- 6M
- -21.76%
- YTD
- -15.61%
- 1Y
- 31.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.94K | $41.87K | $72.93K | |
| $2.04M | $1.68M | $2.91M |
MTYY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | -33.22% | -55.60% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -15.61% | 43.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTYY and PLTM is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTYY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank
MTYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTM
MTYY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTYY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -44.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and PLTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.83% | -44.07% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.35% | -37.66% | -32.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -18.98% | -34.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.14% | — |
Volatility
MTYY vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.18% | 50.97% | -18.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 33.27% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 31.22% | +0.96% |
MTYY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTYY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 241.28%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | 241.28% | 48.98% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTYY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.
MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 241.28%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
MTYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 0.50% for PLTM.
Find the right allocation for MTYY and PLTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer