MTYY vs. CHPY
MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHPY.
Performance
MTYY vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -26.59% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 85.77% return.
MTYY
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -13.74%
- YTD
- -26.59%
- 6M
- -37.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPY
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 29.53%
- YTD
- 85.77%
- 6M
- 85.49%
- 1Y
- 149.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTYY vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | -26.59% | -54.45% |
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 85.77% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTYY and CHPY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTYY vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank
MTYY
CHPY
MTYY vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTYY | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -2.29 | 4.83 | -7.12 |
Drawdowns
MTYY vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -66.57%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and CHPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTYY | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.57% | -12.17% | -54.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.57% | 0.00% | -66.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -1.98% | -46.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility
MTYY vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTYY | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.85% | 27.59% | +7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.85% | 33.17% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.85% | 33.17% | +1.68% |
MTYY vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTYY vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison
MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 183.32%, more than CHPY's 28.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 28.40% | 28.19% |
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | 183.32% | 48.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTYY and CHPY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.
MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 183.32%, compared with 28.40% for CHPY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 0.99% for CHPY.
Find the right allocation for MTYY and CHPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer