MTYY vs. LQTI
MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
MTYY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -33.95% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -1.60% return.
MTYY
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -32.44%
- YTD
- -33.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.40M | $2.20M | $1.68M | |
| $48.29K | $43.25K | $78.51K |
MTYY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | -33.95% | -55.60% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -1.60% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTYY and LQTI is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTYY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
MTYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI
MTYY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTYY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.83% | -3.41% | -67.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.68% | -3.17% | -67.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.50% | -0.98% | -52.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility
MTYY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.35% | 5.19% | +27.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.35% | 5.90% | +26.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.35% | 5.90% | +26.45% |
MTYY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTYY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 243.94%, more than LQTI's 9.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 8.54% | 7.01% |
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | 243.94% | 48.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTYY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.
MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 243.94%, compared with 8.54% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for MTYY and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer