MTYY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

MTYY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -31.48% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.47% return.

MTYY

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -12.36%
• YTD: -31.48%
• 6M: -34.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 4.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTYY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF	-31.48%	-55.60%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.47%	0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MTYY and LQTI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

MTYY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 29
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 25
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTYY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTYY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.45	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.30	—

Drawdowns

MTYY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -69.58%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTYY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.58%	-3.41%	-66.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.58%	-1.13%	-68.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.09%	-0.90%	-50.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MTYY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.54%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.87%	5.11%	+28.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.87%	5.94%	+27.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.87%	5.94%	+27.93%

MTYY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTYY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 210.32%, more than LQTI's 9.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.08%	7.01%
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF	210.32%	48.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTYY and LQTI in my portfolio?

MTYY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MTYY or LQTI?

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTYY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTYY or LQTI?

MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 210.32%, compared with 9.08% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between MTYY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 0.65% for LQTI.